Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity
Silveira, C
Souza, RT
Costa, ML
Parpinelli, MA
Pacagnella, RC
Ferreira, EC
Mayrink, J
Guida, JP
Sousa, MH
Say, L
Chou, D
Filippi, V
Barreix, M
Barbour, K
Firoz, T
von Dadelszen, P
Cecatti, JG
Andreucci, CB
Angelini, CR
Ferraz, JP
Zanardi, DM
Camargo, RS
Cottler, S
Fawole, O
Gadama, L
Ghérissi, A
Gyte, G
Hindin, M
Jayathilaka, A
Kalamar, A
Kone, Y
Kostanjsek, N
Lange, I
Magee, LA
Mathur, A
McCaw-Binns, A
Morgan, M
Munjanja, S
Gichuhi, GN
Petzold, M
Sullivan, E
Taulo, F
Tunçalp, Ö
Vanderkruik, R
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 141 pp. 39 - 47
- Issue Date:
- 2018-05-01
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Silveira, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Souza, RT | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Costa, ML | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Parpinelli, MA | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pacagnella, RC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ferreira, EC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mayrink, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Guida, JP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sousa, MH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Say, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chou, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Filippi, V | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Barreix, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Barbour, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Firoz, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | von Dadelszen, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cecatti, JG | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Andreucci, CB | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Angelini, CR | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ferraz, JP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zanardi, DM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Camargo, RS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cottler, S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fawole, O | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gadama, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ghérissi, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gyte, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hindin, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jayathilaka, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kalamar, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kone, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kostanjsek, N | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lange, I | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Magee, LA | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mathur, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | McCaw-Binns, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Morgan, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Munjanja, S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gichuhi, GN | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Petzold, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Sullivan, E |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Taulo, F | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tunçalp, Ö | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vanderkruik, R | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2018-05-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 141 pp. 39 - 47 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-7292 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/129956 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Objective: To validate the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and the occurrence of maternal morbidity. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Brazilian retrospective cohort study on long-term repercussions of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among women who delivered at a tertiary facility (COMMAG study). We compared WHODAS-12 and WHODAS-36 scores of women with and without SMM using measures of central tendency and variability, tests for instruments’ agreement (Bland-Altman plot), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Cronbach alpha coefficient for internal consistency. Results: The COMMAG study enrolled 638 women up to 5 years postpartum. Although the median WHODAS-36 and -12 scores for all women were statistically different (13.04 and 11.76, respectively; P<0.001), there was a strong linear correlation between them. Furthermore, the mean difference and the differences in variance analyses demonstrated agreement of total scores between the two versions. CFA demonstrated how the WHODAS-12 questions are divided into six previously defined factors and Cronbach alpha showed good internal consistency. Conclusion: WHODAS-12 demonstrated agreement with WHODAS-36 for total score and was a good instrument for screening functioning and disability among postpartum women, with and without SMM. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics | en_US |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1002/ijgo.12465 | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy Complications | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Disability Evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Retrospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility of Results | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Postpartum Period | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | World Health Organization | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Brazil | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.title | Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 141 | en_US |
utslib.for | 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine | en_US |
pubs.embargo.period | Not known | en_US |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Public Health | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | en_US |
pubs.volume | 141 | en_US |
Abstract:
© 2018 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Objective: To validate the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and the occurrence of maternal morbidity. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Brazilian retrospective cohort study on long-term repercussions of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among women who delivered at a tertiary facility (COMMAG study). We compared WHODAS-12 and WHODAS-36 scores of women with and without SMM using measures of central tendency and variability, tests for instruments’ agreement (Bland-Altman plot), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Cronbach alpha coefficient for internal consistency. Results: The COMMAG study enrolled 638 women up to 5 years postpartum. Although the median WHODAS-36 and -12 scores for all women were statistically different (13.04 and 11.76, respectively; P<0.001), there was a strong linear correlation between them. Furthermore, the mean difference and the differences in variance analyses demonstrated agreement of total scores between the two versions. CFA demonstrated how the WHODAS-12 questions are divided into six previously defined factors and Cronbach alpha showed good internal consistency. Conclusion: WHODAS-12 demonstrated agreement with WHODAS-36 for total score and was a good instrument for screening functioning and disability among postpartum women, with and without SMM.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph