The compelling case of the Bowraville murders and its implications for criminal law

Longman, C

The compelling case of the Bowraville murders and its implications for criminal law

Longman, C

Permalink

Publisher:: Law Society of New South Wales
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Law Society Journal, 2019, (55), pp. 70 - 72
Issue Date:: 2019-05

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published VersionAdobe PDF (166.98 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Longman, C https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-9838	en_US
dc.date.issued	2019-05	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Law Society Journal, 2019, (55), pp. 70 - 72	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1839-5287	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/137799
dc.description.abstract	Analysis of the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Attorney General v XX [2018] NSWCCA 198 and its implications for practitioners briefed in attempts to retry accused under the double jeopardy provisions of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2006.	en_US
dc.publisher	Law Society of New South Wales	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Law Society Journal	en_US
dc.title	The compelling case of the Bowraville murders and its implications for criminal law	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	55	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Australia	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost/Jumbunna
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - SIC - Strengthening Indigenous Communities
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.issue	55	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

Analysis of the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Attorney General v XX [2018] NSWCCA 198 and its implications for practitioners briefed in attempts to retry accused under the double jeopardy provisions of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2006.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/137799