General theorising and historical specificity: Hodgson on Keynes
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Journal of Institutional Economics, 2019, 15 (4), pp. 715 - 731
- Issue Date:
- 2019-08-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| general_theorising_and_historical_specificity_hodgson_on_keynes.pdf | Published Version | 234.38 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Copyright © 2019 Millennium Economics Ltd. In relation to Keynes's thought on general theorising, consumption theory and institutions, this paper closely examines Geoff Hodgson's views as set out in his magisterial work, How Economics Forgot History. While in full agreement with its advocacy of the institutionalist programme, it finds that Keynes's position has been misunderstood in all three areas, and that deep compatibilities exist between the General Theory and institutionalist analysis. Using all his available writings, it is argued that Keynes's conception of a general theory is very different from that underpinning neoclassical economics so that criticisms of the latter are irrelevant to the former, that Keynes's 'fundamental psychological law' was never advanced as a universal law applicable to all economies, and that Keynes expressly analysed a historically specific economic institution and its assemblage of sub-institutions. Keynes is an ally, not an enemy, of institutionalism in pursuing better economic theory.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: