Evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D: a literature review.

Pan, T; Mulhern, B; Viney, R; Norman, R; Tran-Duy, A; Hanmer, J; Devlin, N

Evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D: a literature review.

Pan, T Mulhern, B

Viney, R

Norman, R Tran-Duy, A Hanmer, J Devlin, N

Permalink

Publisher:: SPRINGER
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021
Issue Date:: 2021-06-28

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	EvidenceOnTheRelationshipPROMIS-29&EQ-5D.pdf		595.01 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Pan, T
dc.contributor.author	Mulhern, B https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-8063
dc.contributor.author	Viney, R https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0039-9635
dc.contributor.author	Norman, R
dc.contributor.author	Tran-Duy, A
dc.contributor.author	Hanmer, J
dc.contributor.author	Devlin, N
dc.date.accessioned	2021-08-30T01:00:10Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-10
dc.date.available	2021-08-30T01:00:10Z
dc.date.issued	2021-06-28
dc.identifier.citation	Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021
dc.identifier.issn	0962-9343
dc.identifier.issn	1573-2649
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/150255
dc.description.abstract	<h4>Purpose</h4>EQ-5D and PROMIS-29 are both concise, generic measures of patient-reported outcomes accompanied by preference weights that allow the estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Both instruments are candidates for use in economic evaluation. However, they have different features in terms of the domains selected to measure respondents' self-perceived health and the characteristics of (and methods used to obtain) the preference weights. It is important to understand the relationship between the instruments and the implications of choosing either for the evidence used in decision-making. This literature review aimed to synthesise existing evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 (and measures based on it, such as PROMIS-29+2) and EQ-5D (both EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L).<h4>Methods</h4>A literature review was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science to identify studies investigating the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D-based instruments.<h4>Results</h4>The literature search identified 95 unique studies, of which nine studies met the inclusion criteria, i.e. compared both instruments. Six studies examined the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D-5L. Three main types of relationship have been examined in the nine studies: (a) comparing PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D as descriptive systems; (b) mapping PROMIS-29 domains to EQ-5D utilities; and (c) comparing and transforming PROMIS-29 utilities to EQ-5D utilities.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This review has highlighted the lack of evidence regarding the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D. The impact of choosing either instrument on the evidence used in cost-effectiveness analysis is currently unclear. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between the two instruments.
dc.format	Print-Electronic
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	SPRINGER
dc.relation.ispartof	Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/s11136-021-02911-4
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1701 Psychology
dc.subject.classification	Health Policy & Services
dc.title	Evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D: a literature review.
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.location.activity	Netherlands
utslib.for	1117 Public Health and Health Services
utslib.for	1701 Psychology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHERE - Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2021-08-30T01:00:09Z
pubs.publication-status	Published

Abstract:

Purpose

EQ-5D and PROMIS-29 are both concise, generic measures of patient-reported outcomes accompanied by preference weights that allow the estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Both instruments are candidates for use in economic evaluation. However, they have different features in terms of the domains selected to measure respondents' self-perceived health and the characteristics of (and methods used to obtain) the preference weights. It is important to understand the relationship between the instruments and the implications of choosing either for the evidence used in decision-making. This literature review aimed to synthesise existing evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 (and measures based on it, such as PROMIS-29+2) and EQ-5D (both EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L).

Methods

A literature review was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science to identify studies investigating the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D-based instruments.

Results

The literature search identified 95 unique studies, of which nine studies met the inclusion criteria, i.e. compared both instruments. Six studies examined the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D-5L. Three main types of relationship have been examined in the nine studies: (a) comparing PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D as descriptive systems; (b) mapping PROMIS-29 domains to EQ-5D utilities; and (c) comparing and transforming PROMIS-29 utilities to EQ-5D utilities.

Conclusion

This review has highlighted the lack of evidence regarding the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D. The impact of choosing either instrument on the evidence used in cost-effectiveness analysis is currently unclear. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between the two instruments.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/150255