Academic dissent in a post COVID-19 world

Schweinsberg, S; Fennell, D; Hassanli, N

Academic dissent in a post COVID-19 world

Schweinsberg, S Fennell, D Hassanli, N

Permalink

Publisher:: Elsevier BV
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Annals of Tourism Research, 2021, 91, pp. 103289-103289
Issue Date:: 2021-11-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

The embargo period expires on 30 Nov 2024

Download Accepted manuscriptAdobe PDF (888.44 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Schweinsberg, S
dc.contributor.author	Fennell, D
dc.contributor.author	Hassanli, N https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3392-0829
dc.date.accessioned	2021-12-02T04:27:28Z
dc.date.available	2021-12-02T04:27:28Z
dc.date.issued	2021-11-01
dc.identifier.citation	Annals of Tourism Research, 2021, 91, pp. 103289-103289
dc.identifier.issn	0160-7383
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/152027
dc.description.abstract	Tourism academia owes its legitimacy to an established process whereby we employ methodologies rigorously to issues within our sphere of interest to apply, test or generate theories. However, what of instances where there are ideological disagreements between scholars, instances where the future of tourism is not set but rather will be framed by scholars on the basis of their own values-based positions? In the present paper an argument is made that scholars should not solely focus on assessing the technical merits of knowledge. Instead we must grapple with what might constitute a ‘reasonable dissent’ in the context of the “wider habitual in tourism and its scholarship” (Tribe & Liburd, 2017, p. 227).
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartof	Annals of Tourism Research
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1016/j.annals.2021.103289
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subject	1504 Commercial Services, 1505 Marketing, 1506 Tourism
dc.subject.classification	Sport, Leisure & Tourism
dc.title	Academic dissent in a post COVID-19 world
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	91
utslib.for	1504 Commercial Services
utslib.for	1505 Marketing
utslib.for	1506 Tourism
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business/Management Discipline
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
utslib.copyright.embargo	2024-11-30T00:00:00+1000Z
dc.date.updated	2021-12-02T04:27:27Z
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	91

Abstract:

Tourism academia owes its legitimacy to an established process whereby we employ methodologies rigorously to issues within our sphere of interest to apply, test or generate theories. However, what of instances where there are ideological disagreements between scholars, instances where the future of tourism is not set but rather will be framed by scholars on the basis of their own values-based positions? In the present paper an argument is made that scholars should not solely focus on assessing the technical merits of knowledge. Instead we must grapple with what might constitute a ‘reasonable dissent’ in the context of the “wider habitual in tourism and its scholarship” (Tribe & Liburd, 2017, p. 227).

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/152027