| Field |
Value |
Language |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dawson, A
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0926-2202
|
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Assifi, A |
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Turkmani, S |
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-02-22T19:12:58Z |
|
|
dc.date.available |
2022-02-22T19:12:58Z |
|
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-12 |
|
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Reproductive Health, 2022, 19, (1) |
|
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1742-4755 |
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10453/154779
|
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>A woman and girl centred, rights-based approach to health care is critical to achieving sexual and reproductive health. However, women with female genital mutilation in high-income countries have been found to receive sub-optimal care. This study examined documents guiding clinicians in health and community service settings in English-speaking high-income countries to identify approaches to ensure quality women and girl-centred care for those with or at risk of female genital mutilation.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Method</jats:title>
<jats:p>We undertook a scoping review using the integrative model of patient-centredness to identify principles, enablers, and activities to facilitate woman and girl-centred care interactions. We developed an inclusion criterion to identify documents such as guidance statements and tools and technical guidelines, procedural documents and clinical practice guidelines. We searched the databases and websites of health professional associations, ministries of health, hospitals, national, state and local government and non-government organisations working in female genital mutilation in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, The United States, New Zealand, and Australia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool was used to appraise screened documents.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Findings</jats:title>
<jats:p>One-hundred and twenty-four documents were included in this scoping review; 88 were developed in the United Kingdom, 20 in Australia, nine in the United States, three in Canada, two in New Zealand and two in Ireland. The focus of documents from the United Kingdom on multi-professional safeguarding (62), while those retrieved from Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the US focused on clinical practice. Twelve percent of the included documents contained references to all principles of patient-centred care, and only one document spoke to all principles, enablers and activities.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title>
<jats:p>This study demonstrates the need to improve the female genital mutilation-related guidance provided to professionals to care for and protect women and girls. Professionals need to involve women and girls with or at risk of female genital mutilation in the co-design of guidelines and tools and evaluation of them and the co-production of health care.</jats:p>
</jats:sec> |
|
|
dc.language |
en |
|
|
dc.publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
|
|
dc.relation |
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/APP1150970
|
|
|
dc.relation |
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT1150970
|
|
|
dc.relation |
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1150970
|
|
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Reproductive Health |
|
|
dc.relation.isbasedon |
10.1186/s12978-022-01356-3 |
|
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
|
|
dc.rights |
© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, whichpermits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
|
|
dc.subject |
1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine |
|
|
dc.subject.classification |
Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine |
|
|
dc.title |
Woman and girl-centred care for those affected by female genital mutilation: a scoping review of provider tools and guidelines |
|
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
|
utslib.citation.volume |
19 |
|
|
utslib.for |
1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine |
|
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney |
|
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health |
|
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - WHO CC |
|
|
utslib.copyright.status |
open_access |
* |
|
dc.date.updated |
2022-02-22T19:12:56Z |
|
|
pubs.issue |
1 |
|
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published online |
|
|
pubs.volume |
19 |
|
|
utslib.citation.issue |
1 |
|
