Assessing the design of China's complex health system – Concerns on equity and efficiency

Wang, Y; Castelli, A; Cao, Q; Liu, D

Assessing the design of China's complex health system – Concerns on equity and efficiency

Wang, Y Castelli, A Cao, Q Liu, D

Permalink

Publisher:: Elsevier BV
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Health Policy OPEN, 2020, 1, pp. 100021
Issue Date:: 2020-12-01

In Progress

	Filename	Description	Size
	1-s2.0-S2590229620300198-main.pdf	Published version	1.29 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is being processed and is not currently available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wang, Y
dc.contributor.author	Castelli, A
dc.contributor.author	Cao, Q
dc.contributor.author	Liu, D https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-9352
dc.date.accessioned	2022-04-20T00:55:44Z
dc.date.available	2022-04-20T00:55:44Z
dc.date.issued	2020-12-01
dc.identifier.citation	Health Policy OPEN, 2020, 1, pp. 100021
dc.identifier.issn	2590-2296
dc.identifier.issn	2590-2296
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/156488
dc.description.abstract	Following the global trend of moving towards Universal Health Coverage, China has implemented a new round of health system reform, to achieve universal “safe, effective and affordable basic healthcare services” by 2020. We review the latest reforms using the World Health Organization framework developed by Murray and Frenk. In particular, we diagrammatically describe the structure of the current Chinese health system using the dimensions of Stewardship, Resource Generation, Financing and Provision, and assess the variability of access, levels of benefits, and quality of service across populations. We identified several areas of inequity and inefficiency. First, the fragmented institutional arrangements, with distinct objectives and responsibilities across agencies, create potential nonalignment of incentives. Second, there is a marked scarcity of qualified general practitioners and infrastructures despite the continuing effort to improve the gatekeeping function of primary care providers. Third, as risks are pooled only at the local level within different insurance schemes, the considerable income heterogeneity across geographic territories and resident types can generate significant inequality in access and funding. Fourth, persistent patient preference for higher quality healthcare at hospitals prevents the integration of care across tiers. We believe our comprehensive analysis will be informative for both health policymakers and researchers, in identifying and investigating the inefficiencies of the health system and the potentials for structural integration to achieve healthcare equity.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartof	Health Policy OPEN
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100021
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.title	Assessing the design of China's complex health system – Concerns on equity and efficiency
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	1
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHERE - Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation
utslib.copyright.status	in_progress	*
dc.date.updated	2022-04-20T00:55:42Z
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	1

Abstract:

Following the global trend of moving towards Universal Health Coverage, China has implemented a new round of health system reform, to achieve universal “safe, effective and affordable basic healthcare services” by 2020. We review the latest reforms using the World Health Organization framework developed by Murray and Frenk. In particular, we diagrammatically describe the structure of the current Chinese health system using the dimensions of Stewardship, Resource Generation, Financing and Provision, and assess the variability of access, levels of benefits, and quality of service across populations. We identified several areas of inequity and inefficiency. First, the fragmented institutional arrangements, with distinct objectives and responsibilities across agencies, create potential nonalignment of incentives. Second, there is a marked scarcity of qualified general practitioners and infrastructures despite the continuing effort to improve the gatekeeping function of primary care providers. Third, as risks are pooled only at the local level within different insurance schemes, the considerable income heterogeneity across geographic territories and resident types can generate significant inequality in access and funding. Fourth, persistent patient preference for higher quality healthcare at hospitals prevents the integration of care across tiers. We believe our comprehensive analysis will be informative for both health policymakers and researchers, in identifying and investigating the inefficiencies of the health system and the potentials for structural integration to achieve healthcare equity.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/156488