Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: Recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling

Flynn, TN

Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: Recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling

Flynn, TN

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2010, 10 (3), pp. 259 - 267
Issue Date:: 2010-01-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2009003738OK.pdf		854.74 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Flynn, TN	en_US
dc.date.issued	2010-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2010, 10 (3), pp. 259 - 267	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1473-7167	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/15726
dc.description.abstract	There is increased interest in the use of best-worst scaling (BWS) as a method of preference elicitation in health. However, the method is undergoing rapid development in several fields, making dissemination of new insights challenging. Furthermore, there are two types of BWS that have hitherto received little interest in health, but that are uniquely placed to address certain issues. This article offers an update of the state of play of BWS, presents original research to illustrate new methods of analysis and introduces to health researchers some issues on the research frontier. © 2010 Expert Reviews Ltd.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1586/erp.10.29	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Health Policy & Services	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Humans	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Data Interpretation, Statistical	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Quality of Life	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Health Services Research	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Consumer Behavior	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Preference	en_US
dc.title	Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: Recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	3	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	10	en_US
utslib.for	140208 Health Economics	en_US
utslib.for	1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences	en_US
utslib.for	1402 Applied Economics	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CENSOC - Study of Choice
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	3	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	10	en_US

Abstract:

There is increased interest in the use of best-worst scaling (BWS) as a method of preference elicitation in health. However, the method is undergoing rapid development in several fields, making dissemination of new insights challenging. Furthermore, there are two types of BWS that have hitherto received little interest in health, but that are uniquely placed to address certain issues. This article offers an update of the state of play of BWS, presents original research to illustrate new methods of analysis and introduces to health researchers some issues on the research frontier. © 2010 Expert Reviews Ltd.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/15726