Efficacy of novel synthetic bone substitutes in the reconstruction of large segmental bone defects in sheep tibiae.
- Publisher:
- IOP PUBLISHING LTD
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Biomed Mater, 2016, 11, (1), pp. 015016
- Issue Date:
- 2016-02-19
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
19397281_8512535960005671.pdf | Published version | 3.19 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Li, JJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Roohani-Esfahani, S-I | |
dc.contributor.author | Dunstan, CR | |
dc.contributor.author | Quach, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Steck, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Saifzadeh, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Pivonka, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Zreiqat, H | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-15T06:29:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-15T06:29:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Biomed Mater, 2016, 11, (1), pp. 015016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1748-6041 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1748-605X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/160229 | |
dc.description.abstract | The treatment of large bone defects, particularly those with segmental bone loss, remains a significant clinical challenge as current approaches involving surgery or bone grafting often do not yield satisfactory long-term outcomes. This study reports the evaluation of novel ceramic scaffolds applied as bone graft substitutes in a clinically relevant in vivo model. Baghdadite scaffolds, unmodified or modified with a polycaprolactone coating containing bioactive glass nanoparticles, were implanted into critical-sized segmental bone defects in sheep tibiae for 26 weeks. Radiographic, biomechanical, μ-CT and histological analyses showed that both unmodified and modified baghdadite scaffolds were able to withstand physiological loads at the defect site, and induced substantial bone formation in the absence of supplementation with cells or growth factors. Notably, all samples showed significant bridging of the critical-sized defect (average 80%) with evidence of bone infiltration and remodelling within the scaffold implant. The unmodified and modified baghdadite scaffolds achieved similar outcomes of defect repair, although the latter may have an initial mechanical advantage due to the nanocomposite coating. The baghdadite scaffolds evaluated in this study hold potential for use as purely synthetic bone graft substitutes in the treatment of large bone defects while circumventing the drawbacks of autografts and allografts. | |
dc.format | Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | IOP PUBLISHING LTD | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Biomed Mater | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/015016 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | 0903 Biomedical Engineering, 1004 Medical Biotechnology | |
dc.subject.classification | Biomedical Engineering | |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Substitutes | |
dc.subject.mesh | Ceramics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Equipment Design | |
dc.subject.mesh | Equipment Failure Analysis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Materials Testing | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sheep | |
dc.subject.mesh | Silicates | |
dc.subject.mesh | Tibial Fractures | |
dc.subject.mesh | Tissue Engineering | |
dc.subject.mesh | Tissue Scaffolds | |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sheep | |
dc.subject.mesh | Tibial Fractures | |
dc.subject.mesh | Silicates | |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Substitutes | |
dc.subject.mesh | Ceramics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject.mesh | Tissue Engineering | |
dc.subject.mesh | Equipment Design | |
dc.subject.mesh | Equipment Failure Analysis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Materials Testing | |
dc.subject.mesh | Tissue Scaffolds | |
dc.title | Efficacy of novel synthetic bone substitutes in the reconstruction of large segmental bone defects in sheep tibiae. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 11 | |
utslib.location.activity | England | |
utslib.for | 0903 Biomedical Engineering | |
utslib.for | 1004 Medical Biotechnology | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Biomedical Engineering | |
utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | * |
dc.date.updated | 2022-08-15T06:29:18Z | |
pubs.issue | 1 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | |
pubs.volume | 11 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 1 |
Abstract:
The treatment of large bone defects, particularly those with segmental bone loss, remains a significant clinical challenge as current approaches involving surgery or bone grafting often do not yield satisfactory long-term outcomes. This study reports the evaluation of novel ceramic scaffolds applied as bone graft substitutes in a clinically relevant in vivo model. Baghdadite scaffolds, unmodified or modified with a polycaprolactone coating containing bioactive glass nanoparticles, were implanted into critical-sized segmental bone defects in sheep tibiae for 26 weeks. Radiographic, biomechanical, μ-CT and histological analyses showed that both unmodified and modified baghdadite scaffolds were able to withstand physiological loads at the defect site, and induced substantial bone formation in the absence of supplementation with cells or growth factors. Notably, all samples showed significant bridging of the critical-sized defect (average 80%) with evidence of bone infiltration and remodelling within the scaffold implant. The unmodified and modified baghdadite scaffolds achieved similar outcomes of defect repair, although the latter may have an initial mechanical advantage due to the nanocomposite coating. The baghdadite scaffolds evaluated in this study hold potential for use as purely synthetic bone graft substitutes in the treatment of large bone defects while circumventing the drawbacks of autografts and allografts.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph