Phase III, international, multicentre, double-blind, dose increment, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial of duloxetine versus pregabalin for opioid-unresponsive neuropathic cancer pain: a JORTC-PAL16 trial protocol.
Matsuoka, H
Clark, K
Fazekas, B
Oyamada, S
Brown, L
Ishiki, H
Matsuda, Y
Hasuo, H
Ariyoshi, K
Lee, J
Le, B
Allcroft, P
Kochovska, S
Fujiwara, N
Miyaji, T
Lovell, M
Agar, M
Yamaguchi, T
Satomi, E
Iwase, S
Phillips, J
Koyama, A
Currow, DC
- Publisher:
- BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- BMJ Open, 2022, 12, (2), pp. e050182
- Issue Date:
- 2022-02-07
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Matsuoka, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Clark, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Fazekas, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Oyamada, S | |
dc.contributor.author |
Brown, L https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4892-5822 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Ishiki, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Matsuda, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Hasuo, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Ariyoshi, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Le, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Allcroft, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Kochovska, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Fujiwara, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Miyaji, T | |
dc.contributor.author |
Lovell, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1407-2748 |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Agar, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6756-6119 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Yamaguchi, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Satomi, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Iwase, S | |
dc.contributor.author |
Phillips, J https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3691-8230 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Koyama, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Currow, DC | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-30T03:39:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-30T03:39:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | BMJ Open, 2022, 12, (2), pp. e050182 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/162189 | |
dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: Management of neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) refractory to regular opioids remains an important challenge. The efficacy of pregabalin for NCP except chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has already been confirmed in two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared with placebo. Duloxetine offers the potential of analgesia in opioid refractory NCP. However, there are no RCT of duloxetine for the management of opioid-refractory NCP as a first line treatment. Both classes of drugs have the potential to reduce NCP, but there has been no head-to-head comparison for the efficacy and safety, especially given differing side effect profiles. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An international, multicentre, double-blind, dose increment, parallel-arm, RCT is planned. Inclusion criteria include: adults with cancer experiencing NCP refractory to opioids; Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-item 3 (worst pain) of ≥4; Neuropathic Pain on the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale of ≥12 despite of an adequate trial of regular opioid medication (≥60 mg/day oral morphine equivalent dose). Patients with CIPN are excluded.The study will recruit from palliative care teams (both inpatients and outpatients) in Japan and Australia. Participants will be randomised (1:1 allocation ratio) to duloxetine or pregabalin arm. Dose escalation is until day 14 and from day 14 to 21 is a dose de-escalation period to avoid withdrawal effects. The primary endpoint is defined as the mean difference in BPI item 3 for worst pain intensity over the previous 24 hours at day 14 between groups. A sample size of 160 patients will be enrolled between February 2020 and March 2023. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained at Osaka City University Hospital Certified Review Board and South Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international journals and the key findings presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: jRCTs051190097, ACTRN12620000656932. | |
dc.format | Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP | |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMJ Open | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050182 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesics, Opioid | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cancer Pain | |
dc.subject.mesh | Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method | |
dc.subject.mesh | Duloxetine Hydrochloride | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Multicenter Studies as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neuralgia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregabalin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neuralgia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesics, Opioid | |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Multicenter Studies as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregabalin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Duloxetine Hydrochloride | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cancer Pain | |
dc.title | Phase III, international, multicentre, double-blind, dose increment, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial of duloxetine versus pregabalin for opioid-unresponsive neuropathic cancer pain: a JORTC-PAL16 trial protocol. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 12 | |
utslib.location.activity | England | |
utslib.for | 1103 Clinical Sciences | |
utslib.for | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | |
utslib.for | 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHT - Health Technologies | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/IMPACCT | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Centre for Health Technologies (CHT) | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.date.updated | 2022-09-30T03:39:39Z | |
pubs.issue | 2 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | |
pubs.volume | 12 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 2 |
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION: Management of neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) refractory to regular opioids remains an important challenge. The efficacy of pregabalin for NCP except chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has already been confirmed in two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared with placebo. Duloxetine offers the potential of analgesia in opioid refractory NCP. However, there are no RCT of duloxetine for the management of opioid-refractory NCP as a first line treatment. Both classes of drugs have the potential to reduce NCP, but there has been no head-to-head comparison for the efficacy and safety, especially given differing side effect profiles. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An international, multicentre, double-blind, dose increment, parallel-arm, RCT is planned. Inclusion criteria include: adults with cancer experiencing NCP refractory to opioids; Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-item 3 (worst pain) of ≥4; Neuropathic Pain on the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale of ≥12 despite of an adequate trial of regular opioid medication (≥60 mg/day oral morphine equivalent dose). Patients with CIPN are excluded.The study will recruit from palliative care teams (both inpatients and outpatients) in Japan and Australia. Participants will be randomised (1:1 allocation ratio) to duloxetine or pregabalin arm. Dose escalation is until day 14 and from day 14 to 21 is a dose de-escalation period to avoid withdrawal effects. The primary endpoint is defined as the mean difference in BPI item 3 for worst pain intensity over the previous 24 hours at day 14 between groups. A sample size of 160 patients will be enrolled between February 2020 and March 2023. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained at Osaka City University Hospital Certified Review Board and South Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international journals and the key findings presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: jRCTs051190097, ACTRN12620000656932.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph