Informing Infant Nutrition: Timing of Infant Formula Advice, Infant Formula Choice and Preparation in the First 6 Months of Life.

Appleton, J; Russell, CG; Fowler, C; Jansen, E; Burnett, AJ; Rossiter, C; Denney-Wilson, E

Informing Infant Nutrition: Timing of Infant Formula Advice, Infant Formula Choice and Preparation in the First 6 Months of Life.

Appleton, J

Russell, CG Fowler, C

Jansen, E Burnett, AJ Rossiter, C

Denney-Wilson, E

Permalink

Publisher:: Elsevier
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2022, 54, (10), pp. 908-915
Issue Date:: 2022-10

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	PIIS1499404622004195.pdf		284.66 kB		View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Appleton, J https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-4471
dc.contributor.author	Russell, CG
dc.contributor.author	Fowler, C https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7838-8434
dc.contributor.author	Jansen, E
dc.contributor.author	Burnett, AJ
dc.contributor.author	Rossiter, C https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3833-3076
dc.contributor.author	Denney-Wilson, E https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9879-4969
dc.date.accessioned	2022-11-14T04:44:01Z
dc.date.available	2022-06-05
dc.date.available	2022-11-14T04:44:01Z
dc.date.issued	2022-10
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2022, 54, (10), pp. 908-915
dc.identifier.issn	1499-4046
dc.identifier.issn	1878-2620
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/163448
dc.description.abstract	OBJECTIVE: To examine the sources and timing of advice formula feeding parents receive and how this and other factors influence the choice of formula product and formula preparation. DESIGN: Components of a cross-sectional survey. SETTING: A child and family health service in New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Parents (n = 153) who were fully or partially formula feeding infants aged 0-6 months and who visited the service's facilities or its social media site. VARIABLES MEASURED: Type of formula, preparation of formula, and use and sources of formula feeding advice. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U or Pearson's chi-square tests, and inductive content analysis. RESULTS: The most common source of formula feeding advice was the formula tin/packet (96.6%). Although 79.2% received advice from a health professional, only 18.9% reported receiving this advice before using formula. Approximately half (48.0%) of the parents chose a standard cow's milk-based formula. The most common reason for their choice of formula type/brand was a personal recommendation (53.0%). Parents' responses indicated that nearly half (46.3%) incorrectly prepared the formula. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Although health professional advice was widely received, this was rarely before starting formula. Despite the current national infant feeding regulations, parents who were not exclusively breastfeeding their infants did not always receive timely, health professional advice about formula feeding.
dc.format	Print
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1016/j.jneb.2022.06.002
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	11 Medical and Health Sciences, 13 Education, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
dc.subject.classification	Nutrition & Dietetics
dc.subject.mesh	Animals
dc.subject.mesh	Breast Feeding
dc.subject.mesh	Cattle
dc.subject.mesh	Cross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject.mesh	Female
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Infant
dc.subject.mesh	Infant Formula
dc.subject.mesh	Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
dc.subject.mesh	Tin
dc.subject.mesh	Animals
dc.subject.mesh	Breast Feeding
dc.subject.mesh	Cattle
dc.subject.mesh	Cross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject.mesh	Female
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Infant
dc.subject.mesh	Infant Formula
dc.subject.mesh	Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
dc.subject.mesh	Tin
dc.subject.mesh	Animals
dc.subject.mesh	Cattle
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Tin
dc.subject.mesh	Cross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject.mesh	Breast Feeding
dc.subject.mesh	Infant Formula
dc.subject.mesh	Infant
dc.subject.mesh	Female
dc.subject.mesh	Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
dc.title	Informing Infant Nutrition: Timing of Infant Formula Advice, Infant Formula Choice and Preparation in the First 6 Months of Life.
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	54
utslib.location.activity	United States
utslib.for	11 Medical and Health Sciences
utslib.for	13 Education
utslib.for	17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHSP - Health Services and Practice
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
pubs.consider-herdc	false
dc.date.updated	2022-11-14T04:43:59Z
pubs.issue	10
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	54
utslib.citation.issue	10

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To examine the sources and timing of advice formula feeding parents receive and how this and other factors influence the choice of formula product and formula preparation. DESIGN: Components of a cross-sectional survey. SETTING: A child and family health service in New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Parents (n = 153) who were fully or partially formula feeding infants aged 0-6 months and who visited the service's facilities or its social media site. VARIABLES MEASURED: Type of formula, preparation of formula, and use and sources of formula feeding advice. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U or Pearson's chi-square tests, and inductive content analysis. RESULTS: The most common source of formula feeding advice was the formula tin/packet (96.6%). Although 79.2% received advice from a health professional, only 18.9% reported receiving this advice before using formula. Approximately half (48.0%) of the parents chose a standard cow's milk-based formula. The most common reason for their choice of formula type/brand was a personal recommendation (53.0%). Parents' responses indicated that nearly half (46.3%) incorrectly prepared the formula. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Although health professional advice was widely received, this was rarely before starting formula. Despite the current national infant feeding regulations, parents who were not exclusively breastfeeding their infants did not always receive timely, health professional advice about formula feeding.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/163448