Too big to prevail: The paradox of power in coalition formation
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Games and Economic Behavior, 2022, 135, pp. 394-410
- Issue Date:
- 2022-09-01
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0899825622000896-main.pdf | Published version | 1.07 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
In standard coalition games, players try to form a coalition to secure a prize and a coalition agreement specifies how the prize is to be split among its members. However, in practical situations where coalitions are formed, the actual split of the prize often takes place after the coalition formation stage. This creates the possibility for some players to ask for a renegotiation of the initial split. We predict that, in such situations, a player can suffer from being “too strong”. Our experimental results confirm that, when the actual split of the prize is delayed, a player's strength can turn into a strategic disadvantage: a greater voting power in forming a winning coalition is undermined by the threat of being overly powerful when a split is determined. This result is relevant to many real world situations where “too strong” players find it paradoxically hard to form coalitions with weaker players.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: