Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol.

Bull, C; Teede, H; Carrandi, L; Rigney, A; Cusack, S; Callander, E

Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol.

Bull, C Teede, H Carrandi, L Rigney, A Cusack, S Callander, E

Permalink

Publisher:: BMJ
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: BMJ Open, 2022, 12, (2), pp. e058952
Issue Date:: 2022-02-10

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (411.7 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Bull, C
dc.contributor.author	Teede, H
dc.contributor.author	Carrandi, L
dc.contributor.author	Rigney, A
dc.contributor.author	Cusack, S
dc.contributor.author	Callander, E https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7233-6804
dc.date.accessioned	2023-02-10T02:30:11Z
dc.date.available	2023-02-10T02:30:11Z
dc.date.issued	2022-02-10
dc.identifier.citation	BMJ Open, 2022, 12, (2), pp. e058952
dc.identifier.issn	2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn	2044-6055
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/166040
dc.description.abstract	INTRODUCTION: Woman-centred care is the right of every woman receiving maternity care, irrespective of where care is being received and who is providing care. This protocol describes a planned systematic review that will identify, describe and critically appraise the psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The woman-centricity of PROM and PREM development and content validation (ie, the extent to which women were involved in these processes) will also be assessed. This information will be used to develop a maternity PROMs and PREMs database to support service and system performance measurement, and value-based maternity care initiatives. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments. Studies identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and EMBASE describing the development, content validation and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs and PREMs specifically designed for maternity populations throughout pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal periods will be considered if published from 2010 onward, in English, and available in full text. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist will be used to evaluate the quality of studies reporting on the development, content validation and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs and PREMs. COSMIN criteria for good content validity will be used to assess the woman-centricity of PROM and PREM development and content validation studies. COSMIN standards of good psychometric properties will be used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the identified instruments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical permission for this research is not required. The findings of this research will be submitted for publication in an international, peer-reviewed journal. Abstracts for national and international conference presentations will also be submitted. The proposed maternity PROMs and PREMs database will be freely accessible online, and developed with consumer input to ensure its usefulness to a range of maternity care stakeholders. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021288854.
dc.format	Electronic
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	BMJ
dc.relation.ispartof	BMJ Open
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058952
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject	1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
dc.subject.mesh	Checklist
dc.subject.mesh	Female
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Maternal Health Services
dc.subject.mesh	Parturition
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subject.mesh	Pregnancy
dc.subject.mesh	Psychometrics
dc.subject.mesh	Quality of Life
dc.subject.mesh	Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject.mesh	Systematic Reviews as Topic
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject.mesh	Psychometrics
dc.subject.mesh	Pregnancy
dc.subject.mesh	Parturition
dc.subject.mesh	Quality of Life
dc.subject.mesh	Maternal Health Services
dc.subject.mesh	Female
dc.subject.mesh	Checklist
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subject.mesh	Systematic Reviews as Topic
dc.subject.mesh	Checklist
dc.subject.mesh	Female
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Maternal Health Services
dc.subject.mesh	Parturition
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subject.mesh	Pregnancy
dc.subject.mesh	Psychometrics
dc.subject.mesh	Quality of Life
dc.subject.mesh	Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject.mesh	Systematic Reviews as Topic
dc.title	Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol.
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	12
utslib.location.activity	England
utslib.for	1103 Clinical Sciences
utslib.for	1117 Public Health and Health Services
utslib.for	1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
dc.date.updated	2023-02-10T02:30:04Z
pubs.issue	2
pubs.publication-status	Published online
pubs.volume	12
utslib.citation.issue	2

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Woman-centred care is the right of every woman receiving maternity care, irrespective of where care is being received and who is providing care. This protocol describes a planned systematic review that will identify, describe and critically appraise the psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The woman-centricity of PROM and PREM development and content validation (ie, the extent to which women were involved in these processes) will also be assessed. This information will be used to develop a maternity PROMs and PREMs database to support service and system performance measurement, and value-based maternity care initiatives. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments. Studies identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and EMBASE describing the development, content validation and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs and PREMs specifically designed for maternity populations throughout pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal periods will be considered if published from 2010 onward, in English, and available in full text. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist will be used to evaluate the quality of studies reporting on the development, content validation and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs and PREMs. COSMIN criteria for good content validity will be used to assess the woman-centricity of PROM and PREM development and content validation studies. COSMIN standards of good psychometric properties will be used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the identified instruments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical permission for this research is not required. The findings of this research will be submitted for publication in an international, peer-reviewed journal. Abstracts for national and international conference presentations will also be submitted. The proposed maternity PROMs and PREMs database will be freely accessible online, and developed with consumer input to ensure its usefulness to a range of maternity care stakeholders. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021288854.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/166040