Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance.

Bull, C; Teede, H; Watson, D; Callander, EJ

Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance.

Bull, C Teede, H Watson, D Callander, EJ

Permalink

Publisher:: American Medical Association (AMA)
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: JAMA Health Forum, 2022, 3, (4), pp. e220326
Issue Date:: 2022-04-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (973.84 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Bull, C
dc.contributor.author	Teede, H
dc.contributor.author	Watson, D
dc.contributor.author	Callander, EJ
dc.date.accessioned	2023-02-13T04:05:02Z
dc.date.available	2023-02-13T04:05:02Z
dc.date.issued	2022-04-01
dc.identifier.citation	JAMA Health Forum, 2022, 3, (4), pp. e220326
dc.identifier.issn	2689-0186
dc.identifier.issn	2689-0186
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/166078
dc.description.abstract	IMPORTANCE: Psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are critical to evaluating quality and performance across health services and systems. However, the adoption and implementation of PROMs and PREMs remain a challenge in many countries. The aim of this guide is to support instrument selection and implementation to measure health system performance. OBSERVATIONS: The guide is split into 3 step-by-step sections. Step 1: Knowing What to Measure discusses what PROMs and PREMs capture and how they differ from related instruments. Step 2: Choosing the Right Instrument describes the critical psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness, and provides resources to support instrument selection and evaluation. Step 3: Mitigating Potential PROM and PREM Implementation Barriers outlines key barriers and supports for instrument implementation at system, service, and individual levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This guide aims to provide practical resources for the identification of psychometrically robust PROMs and PREMs, as well as support for their implementation to drive improvements across health systems globally.
dc.format	Electronic
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	American Medical Association (AMA)
dc.relation.ispartof	JAMA Health Forum
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights	This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subject.mesh	Psychometrics
dc.subject.mesh	Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject.mesh	Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject.mesh	Psychometrics
dc.subject.mesh	Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subject.mesh	Psychometrics
dc.subject.mesh	Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject.mesh	Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.title	Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance.
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	3
utslib.location.activity	United States
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
dc.date.updated	2023-02-13T04:05:00Z
pubs.issue	4
pubs.publication-status	Published online
pubs.volume	3
utslib.citation.issue	4

Abstract:

IMPORTANCE: Psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are critical to evaluating quality and performance across health services and systems. However, the adoption and implementation of PROMs and PREMs remain a challenge in many countries. The aim of this guide is to support instrument selection and implementation to measure health system performance. OBSERVATIONS: The guide is split into 3 step-by-step sections. Step 1: Knowing What to Measure discusses what PROMs and PREMs capture and how they differ from related instruments. Step 2: Choosing the Right Instrument describes the critical psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness, and provides resources to support instrument selection and evaluation. Step 3: Mitigating Potential PROM and PREM Implementation Barriers outlines key barriers and supports for instrument implementation at system, service, and individual levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This guide aims to provide practical resources for the identification of psychometrically robust PROMs and PREMs, as well as support for their implementation to drive improvements across health systems globally.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/166078