Corrigendum to "The costs, health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis: A systematic review" [Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 129 (2022) 104216].

Publisher:
Elsevier
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Int J Nurs Stud, 2023, 139, pp. 104433
Issue Date:
2023-03
Filename Description Size
1-s2.0-S0020748922002620-main.pdf194.69 kB
Adobe PDF
Full metadata record
In the supplementary material to this paper we noted some errors in supplementary Online Resource 4: (a) The title ‘CHEERS checklist’ should be deleted and replaced with ‘CHEERS checklist and adapted scoring criteria’. (b) We should have cited the following two references: Lynch et al., 2019 and Husereau et al., 2013 in the title: • D. Husereau, M. Drummond, S. Petrou, C. Carswell, D. Moher, D. Greenberg, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)–explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value in Health, 16 (2) (2013), pp. 231-250 • M. Lynch, R. De Abreu Lourenco, M. Flattery, M. Haas. Reviewing the cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in an Australian context. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 59 (2019), pp. 21-35 (c) In Row 7 (Comparators), the example offered ‘e.g. IUS is used rather than LNG-IUS20 or Mirena’ should be disregarded because ‘LNG-IUS20 or Mirena’ was included in error and was not relevant to this paper. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: