How Moderator Variables Affect Scheduling Objectives in Unpaced Mixed-Model Assembly Lines

Publisher:
Springer Nature
Publication Type:
Chapter
Citation:
Lecture Notes in Production Engineering, 2023, Part F1164, pp. 419-431
Issue Date:
2023-01-01
Filename Description Size
Moderator.pdfPublished version130.66 kB
Adobe PDF
Full metadata record
Besides the sequence itself also additional factors serving as moderator variables affect the value of scheduling objectives. For mixed-model assembly lines, especially number and heterogeneity of different products, their volume mix proportions, average workload of the jobs to process and the degree of grouping of identical jobs within the sequence play a major role. By means of a simulation study based on data from a real unpaced mixed-model assembly line in the automotive industry, this work analyzes the impact of these moderating variables on various scheduling objectives. The analyzed scheduling objectives encompass flow-related objectives like mean flow time, productivity-related objectives like makespan, customer-related objectives like mean earliness, the supplier-related objective part usage rate variation and the human-related objectives mean learning effect and mean deterioration effect per job. Simulation scenarios are defined that differ regarding number and heterogeneity of products from three homogeneous to seven more heterogeneous products. Within every simulation scenario the volume mix proportions of the products, and inherently also the average workload of jobs, are systematically varied. Every simulation scenario is analyzed for five sequence types differing in the degree of grouping of identical jobs. For almost all scheduling objectives, strong dependencies on the volume mix proportions can be perceived, particularly for mean flow time. Homogeneous volume mixes with a dominating product in the mix often lead to other objective values compared to heterogeneous volume mixes that allow using alternation effects between various products in a sequence. Concerning degree of grouping, while some scheduling objectives like part usage rate variation are always strongly affected by the degree of grouping for every volume mix, other objectives like throughput show strong dependence only for some mixes and makespan does not even show any tendency. Average workload plays a less important but still recognizable role as moderator variable for most objectives except for throughput for which workload is a major explanatory factor. Number and heterogeneity of different products has a strong impact on mean learning and deterioration effects.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: