Australasian genetic counselors' attitudes toward disability and prenatal testing: Findings from a cross-sectional survey.
Yanes, T
Nathan, V
Wallingford, C
Faragher, R
Nankervis, K
Jacobs, C
Vassos, M
Boyle, F
Carroll, A
Smith, S
McInerney-Leo, A
Vassos, M
Boyle, F
Carroll, A
Smith, S
McInerney-Leo, A
- Publisher:
- WILEY
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- J Genet Couns, 2023
- Issue Date:
- 2023-09-21
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Diagnostic genetic testing and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for conditions associated with disability are becoming increasingly available to consumers. This genetic information can be used in the disability setting to inform factors such as prognosis, management, and reproductive decision-making. Genetic counselors (GCs) play an important role in the provision of genetic testing and NIPT, and their attitudes toward disability can influence how genetic information is communicated and shape patients' responses. This study aimed to evaluate and describe Australasian GCs' experience with and attitudes toward disabilities to identify potential biases and training needs. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to 400 GCs registered with the Human Genetics Society of Australasia. Of the 106 respondents (participation rate: 26%), a significantly greater proportion were more comfortable interacting with individuals with physical disability as compared to intellectual disability (p < 0.001). GCs with personal experiences with disabilities reported significantly greater comfort interacting with people with intellectual disability than those without experience (p = 0.012). Qualitative analysis revealed discomfort was less reflective of bias than inexperience and apprehension about communicating disrespectfully. GCs believed people with disabilities experience discrimination and that having a disability could make a person stronger, wiser, and more motivated. Most GCs viewed prenatal testing for disabilities positively as it allowed for decisions regarding continuing the pregnancy and/or provided opportunity to prepare. Challenges identified for prenatal counseling included negative societal attitudes and the low visibility of disability. GCs felt that 'personal beliefs' was the primary factor influencing the decision to terminate a pregnancy affected by disability. These findings highlight important education and training needs for GCs to improve preparedness and comfort when communicating with people with a disability.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: