Do Reader Characteristics Affect Diagnostic Efficacy in Screening Mammography? A Systematic Review.
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Clin Breast Cancer, 2023, 23, (3), pp. e56-e67
- Issue Date:
- 2023-04
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S1526820923000198-main.pdf | Published version | 707.9 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
To examine reader characteristics associated with diagnostic efficacy in the interpretation of screening mammograms. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using databases such as Cochrane, Scopus, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed. Search terms were combined with "AND" or "OR" and included: "Radiologist's characteristics AND performance"; "radiologist experience AND screening mammography"; "annual volume read AND diagnostic efficacy"; "screening mammography performance OR diagnostic efficacy". Studies were included if they assessed reader performance in screening mammography interpretation, breast readers, used a reference standard to assess the performance, and were published in the English language. Twenty-eight studies were reviewed. Increasing reader's age was associated with lower false positive rates. No association was found between gender and performance. Half of the studies showed no association between years of reading mammograms and performance. Most studies showed that high reading volume was more likely to be associated with increased sensitivity, cancer detection rates (CDR), lower recall rate, and lower false positive rates. Inconsistent associations were found between fellowship training in breast imaging and reader performance. Specialization in breast imaging was associated with better CDR, sensitivity, and specificity. Limited studies were available to establish the association between performance and factors such as time spent in breast imaging (n = 2), screening focus (n = 1), formal rotation in mammography (n = 1), owner of practice (n = 1), and practice type (n = 1). No individual characteristics is associated with versatility in diagnostic efficacy, albeit reading volume and specialization in breast imaging appear to be associated with with increased sensitivity and CDR without significantly affecting other performance metrics.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: