Development of the What Matters 2 Adults (WM2A) wellbeing measure for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults.
Howard, K
Garvey, G
Anderson, K
Dickson, M
Viney, R
Ratcliffe, J
Howell, M
Gall, A
Cunningham, J
Whop, LJ
Cass, A
Jaure, A
Mulhern, B
- Publisher:
- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Soc Sci Med, 2024, 347, pp. 116694
- Issue Date:
- 2024-04
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Howard, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Garvey, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Dickson, M | |
dc.contributor.author |
Viney, R https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0039-9635 |
|
dc.contributor.author | Ratcliffe, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Howell, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Gall, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Cunningham, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Whop, LJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Cass, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Jaure, A | |
dc.contributor.author |
Mulhern, B https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-8063 |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-19T05:28:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-12 | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-19T05:28:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Soc Sci Med, 2024, 347, pp. 116694 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-9536 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-5347 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/180875 | |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: As wellbeing is culturally bound, wellbeing measures for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples must be culturally relevant and grounded in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander values and preferences. We describe the development of a nationally-relevant and culturally grounded wellbeing measure for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults: the What Matters to Adults (WM2A) measure. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to measure development, combining Indigenist methodologies and psychometric methods. Candidate items were derived through a large national qualitative study. Think-aloud interviews (n = 17) were conducted to assess comprehension, acceptability, and wording of candidate items. Two national surveys collected data on the item pool (n = 312, n = 354). Items were analysed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and item response theory (IRT) to test dimensionality, local dependence and item fit. A Collaborative Yarning approach ensured Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices were privileged throughout. RESULTS: Fifty candidate items were developed, refined, and tested. Using EFA, an eight factor model was developed. All items met pre-specified thresholds for maximum endorsement frequencies, and floor and ceiling effects; no item redundancy was identified. Ten items did not meet thresholds for aggregate adjacent endorsement frequencies. During Collaborative Yarning, six items were removed based on low factor loadings (<0.4) and twelve due to conceptual overlap, high correlations with other items, endorsement frequencies, and/or low IRT item level information. Several items were retained for content validity. The final measure includes 32 items across 10 domains (Balance & control; Hope & resilience; Caring for others; Culture & Country; Spirit & identity; Feeling valued; Connection with others; Access; Racism & worries; Pride & strength). CONCLUSIONS: The unique combination of Indigenist and psychometric methodologies to develop WM2A ensures a culturally and psychometrically robust measure, relevant across a range of settings and applications. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Soc Sci Med | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116694 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 14 Economics, 16 Studies in Human Society | |
dc.subject.classification | Public Health | |
dc.subject.classification | 38 Economics | |
dc.subject.classification | 42 Health sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | 44 Human society | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples | |
dc.subject.mesh | Emotions | |
dc.subject.mesh | Factor Analysis, Statistical | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services, Indigenous | |
dc.subject.mesh | Indigenous Peoples | |
dc.subject.mesh | Psychometrics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Factor Analysis, Statistical | |
dc.subject.mesh | Emotions | |
dc.subject.mesh | Psychometrics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services, Indigenous | |
dc.subject.mesh | Indigenous Peoples | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples | |
dc.subject.mesh | Emotions | |
dc.subject.mesh | Factor Analysis, Statistical | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Services, Indigenous | |
dc.subject.mesh | Indigenous Peoples | |
dc.subject.mesh | Psychometrics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australia | |
dc.title | Development of the What Matters 2 Adults (WM2A) wellbeing measure for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 347 | |
utslib.location.activity | England | |
utslib.for | 11 Medical and Health Sciences | |
utslib.for | 14 Economics | |
utslib.for | 16 Studies in Human Society | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHERE - Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Research Centres/Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE) | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Research Centres | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.rights.license | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.license | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-09-19T05:28:23Z | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 347 |
Abstract:
PURPOSE: As wellbeing is culturally bound, wellbeing measures for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples must be culturally relevant and grounded in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander values and preferences. We describe the development of a nationally-relevant and culturally grounded wellbeing measure for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults: the What Matters to Adults (WM2A) measure. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to measure development, combining Indigenist methodologies and psychometric methods. Candidate items were derived through a large national qualitative study. Think-aloud interviews (n = 17) were conducted to assess comprehension, acceptability, and wording of candidate items. Two national surveys collected data on the item pool (n = 312, n = 354). Items were analysed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and item response theory (IRT) to test dimensionality, local dependence and item fit. A Collaborative Yarning approach ensured Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices were privileged throughout. RESULTS: Fifty candidate items were developed, refined, and tested. Using EFA, an eight factor model was developed. All items met pre-specified thresholds for maximum endorsement frequencies, and floor and ceiling effects; no item redundancy was identified. Ten items did not meet thresholds for aggregate adjacent endorsement frequencies. During Collaborative Yarning, six items were removed based on low factor loadings (<0.4) and twelve due to conceptual overlap, high correlations with other items, endorsement frequencies, and/or low IRT item level information. Several items were retained for content validity. The final measure includes 32 items across 10 domains (Balance & control; Hope & resilience; Caring for others; Culture & Country; Spirit & identity; Feeling valued; Connection with others; Access; Racism & worries; Pride & strength). CONCLUSIONS: The unique combination of Indigenist and psychometric methodologies to develop WM2A ensures a culturally and psychometrically robust measure, relevant across a range of settings and applications.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph