Identifying and Minimizing Incentives for Competing Interests in Sports Medicine Publications.
- Publisher:
- ADIS INT LTD
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Sports Med, 2024, 54, (8), pp. 1991-2000
- Issue Date:
- 2024-08
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s40279-024-02037-w.pdf | Published version | 643.83 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Full metadata record
| Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Shrier, I | |
| dc.contributor.author | Impellizzeri, FM | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stovitz, SD | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-30T03:39:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-17 | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-30T03:39:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Sports Med, 2024, 54, (8), pp. 1991-2000 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0112-1642 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1179-2035 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/181625 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Academics in sports medicine as well as other medical fields are generally expected to publish research and opinions in peer-reviewed journals. The peer-review process is intended to protect against the publication of flawed research and unsubstantiated claims. However, both financial and non-financial competing interests may result in sub-optimal results by affecting investigators, editors, peer reviewers, academic institutions, and publishers. In this article, we focus on the non-financial competing interests created in our current academic system. Because these competing interests are embedded in our current scholastic framework, the potential biases are difficult to quantify. To minimize the effect of these competing interests, we review and highlight some underlying incentives for each stakeholder and some potential solutions to mitigate their effects. | |
| dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ADIS INT LTD | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Sports Med | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1007/s40279-024-02037-w | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | 0913 Mechanical Engineering, 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy | |
| dc.subject.classification | Sport Sciences | |
| dc.subject.classification | 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science | |
| dc.subject.classification | 4207 Sports science and exercise | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Sports Medicine | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Conflict of Interest | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Motivation | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Peer Review, Research | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Periodicals as Topic | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Publishing | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Motivation | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Peer Review, Research | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Sports Medicine | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Conflict of Interest | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Publishing | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Periodicals as Topic | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Sports Medicine | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Conflict of Interest | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Motivation | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Peer Review, Research | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Periodicals as Topic | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Publishing | |
| dc.title | Identifying and Minimizing Incentives for Competing Interests in Sports Medicine Publications. | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| utslib.citation.volume | 54 | |
| utslib.location.activity | New Zealand | |
| utslib.for | 0913 Mechanical Engineering | |
| utslib.for | 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences | |
| utslib.for | 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Human Performance Research Centre (HPRC) | |
| utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | * |
| dc.date.updated | 2024-10-30T03:39:20Z | |
| pubs.issue | 8 | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | |
| pubs.volume | 54 | |
| utslib.citation.issue | 8 |
Abstract:
Academics in sports medicine as well as other medical fields are generally expected to publish research and opinions in peer-reviewed journals. The peer-review process is intended to protect against the publication of flawed research and unsubstantiated claims. However, both financial and non-financial competing interests may result in sub-optimal results by affecting investigators, editors, peer reviewers, academic institutions, and publishers. In this article, we focus on the non-financial competing interests created in our current academic system. Because these competing interests are embedded in our current scholastic framework, the potential biases are difficult to quantify. To minimize the effect of these competing interests, we review and highlight some underlying incentives for each stakeholder and some potential solutions to mitigate their effects.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph