Colorectal cancer survivors' experiences and views of shared and telehealth models of survivorship care: A qualitative study.
Gore, C
Lisy, K
O'Callaghan, C
Wood, C
Emery, J
Martin, A
De Abreu Lourenco, R
Schofield, P
Jefford, M
- Publisher:
- WILEY
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Psychooncology, 2024, 33, (1), pp. e6265
- Issue Date:
- 2024-01
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gore, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Lisy, K | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Callaghan, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Wood, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Emery, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, A | |
dc.contributor.author |
De Abreu Lourenco, R |
|
dc.contributor.author | Schofield, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Jefford, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T04:48:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-26 | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T04:48:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Psychooncology, 2024, 33, (1), pp. e6265 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1057-9249 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1099-1611 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/185029 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: The number of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors is increasing and current models of survivorship care are unsustainable. There is a drive to implement alternative models of care including shared care between general practitioners (GPs) and hospital-based providers. The primary objective of this study was to explore perspectives on facilitators and barriers to shared care. The secondary objective was to explore experiences of telehealth-delivered care. METHOD: Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with participants in the Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors (SCORE) randomised controlled trial. Interviews explored patient experiences of usual and shared survivorship care during the SCORE trial. In response to the COVID pandemic, participant experiences of telehealth appointments were also explored. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty survivors of CRC were interviewed with an even number in the shared and usual care arms; 14 (70%) were male. Facilitators to shared care included: good relationships with GPs; convenience of GPs; good communication between providers; desire to reduce public health system pressures. Barriers included: poor communication between clinicians; inaccessibility of GPs; beliefs about GP capacity; and a preference for follow-up care with the hospital after positive treatment experiences. Participants also commonly expressed a preference for telehealth-based follow-up when there was no need for a clinical examination. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of few studies that have explored patient experiences with shared and telehealth-based survivorship care. Findings can guide the implementation of these models, particularly around care coordination, communication, preparation, and personalised pathways of care. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | WILEY | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Psychooncology | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1002/pon.6265 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis, 1701 Psychology | |
dc.subject.classification | Oncology & Carcinogenesis | |
dc.subject.classification | 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | 52 Psychology | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cancer Survivors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Colorectal Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survivors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survivorship | |
dc.subject.mesh | Telemedicine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Colorectal Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Telemedicine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survivors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cancer Survivors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survivorship | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cancer Survivors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Colorectal Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survivors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survivorship | |
dc.subject.mesh | Telemedicine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | |
dc.title | Colorectal cancer survivors' experiences and views of shared and telehealth models of survivorship care: A qualitative study. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 33 | |
utslib.location.activity | England | |
utslib.for | 1103 Clinical Sciences | |
utslib.for | 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis | |
utslib.for | 1701 Psychology | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/INSIGHT: Institute for Innovative Solutions for Well-being and Health/Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE) | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/INSIGHT: Institute for Innovative Solutions for Well-being and Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Centre for Health Technologies (CHT) | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.rights.license | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.date.updated | 2025-02-07T04:48:50Z | |
pubs.issue | 1 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 33 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 1 |
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: The number of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors is increasing and current models of survivorship care are unsustainable. There is a drive to implement alternative models of care including shared care between general practitioners (GPs) and hospital-based providers. The primary objective of this study was to explore perspectives on facilitators and barriers to shared care. The secondary objective was to explore experiences of telehealth-delivered care. METHOD: Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with participants in the Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors (SCORE) randomised controlled trial. Interviews explored patient experiences of usual and shared survivorship care during the SCORE trial. In response to the COVID pandemic, participant experiences of telehealth appointments were also explored. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty survivors of CRC were interviewed with an even number in the shared and usual care arms; 14 (70%) were male. Facilitators to shared care included: good relationships with GPs; convenience of GPs; good communication between providers; desire to reduce public health system pressures. Barriers included: poor communication between clinicians; inaccessibility of GPs; beliefs about GP capacity; and a preference for follow-up care with the hospital after positive treatment experiences. Participants also commonly expressed a preference for telehealth-based follow-up when there was no need for a clinical examination. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of few studies that have explored patient experiences with shared and telehealth-based survivorship care. Findings can guide the implementation of these models, particularly around care coordination, communication, preparation, and personalised pathways of care.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph