Biphasic pretreatment excels over conventional sulfuric acid in pinewood biorefinery: An environmental analysis.
Khounani, Z
Abdul Razak, NN
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H
Madadi, M
Sun, F
Mohammadi, P
Mahlia, TMI
Aghbashlo, M
Tabatabaei, M
- Publisher:
- ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Environ Res, 2024, 248, pp. 118286
- Issue Date:
- 2024-05-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S0013935124001907-main.pdf | Published version | 4.95 MB | Adobe PDF |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Full metadata record
| Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Khounani, Z | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abdul Razak, NN | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H | |
| dc.contributor.author | Madadi, M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sun, F | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mohammadi, P | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mahlia, TMI | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aghbashlo, M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tabatabaei, M | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-13T03:34:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-20 | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-13T03:34:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-05-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Environ Res, 2024, 248, pp. 118286 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0013-9351 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1096-0953 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/185772 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study assesses the environmental impact of pine chip-based biorefinery processes, focusing on bioethanol, xylonic acid, and lignin production. A cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is employed, comparing a novel biphasic pretreatment method (p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH)/pentanol, Sc-1) with conventional sulfuric acid pretreatment (H2SO4, Sc-2). The analysis spans biomass handling, pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, yeast fermentation, and distillation. Sc-1 yielded an environmental impact of 1.45E+01 kPt, predominantly affecting human health (96.55%), followed by ecosystems (3.07%) and resources (0.38%). Bioethanol, xylonic acid, and lignin contributed 32.61%, 29.28%, and 38.11% to the total environmental burdens, respectively. Sc-2 resulted in an environmental burden of 1.64E+01 kPt, with a primary impact on human health (96.56%) and smaller roles for ecosystems (3.07%) and resources (0.38%). Bioethanol, xylonic acid, and lignin contributed differently at 22.59%, 12.5%, and 64.91%, respectively. Electricity generation was predominant in both scenarios, accounting for 99.05% of the environmental impact, primarily driven by its extensive usage in biomass handling and pretreatment processes. Sc-1 demonstrated a 13.05% lower environmental impact than Sc-2 due to decreased electricity consumption and increased bioethanol and xylonic acid outputs. This study highlights the pivotal role of pretreatment methods in wood-based biorefineries and underscores the urgency of sustainable alternatives like TsOH/pentanol. Additionally, adopting greener electricity generation, advanced technologies, and process optimization are crucial for reducing the environmental footprint of waste-based biorefineries while preserving valuable bioproduct production. | |
| dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Environ Res | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118286 | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | 03 Chemical Sciences, 05 Environmental Sciences, 06 Biological Sciences | |
| dc.subject.classification | Toxicology | |
| dc.subject.classification | 31 Biological sciences | |
| dc.subject.classification | 34 Chemical sciences | |
| dc.subject.classification | 41 Environmental sciences | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Lignin | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Ecosystem | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Pentanols | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biotechnology | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biomass | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Hydrolysis | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biofuels | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Sulfuric Acids | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Sulfuric Acids | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Pentanols | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Lignin | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biotechnology | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Ecosystem | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biomass | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Hydrolysis | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biofuels | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Lignin | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Ecosystem | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Pentanols | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biotechnology | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biomass | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Hydrolysis | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Biofuels | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Sulfuric Acids | |
| dc.title | Biphasic pretreatment excels over conventional sulfuric acid in pinewood biorefinery: An environmental analysis. | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| utslib.citation.volume | 248 | |
| utslib.location.activity | Netherlands | |
| utslib.for | 03 Chemical Sciences | |
| utslib.for | 05 Environmental Sciences | |
| utslib.for | 06 Biological Sciences | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Civil and Environmental Engineering | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater (CTWW) | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial lnformation Systems (CAMGIS) | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Centre for Green Technology (CGT) | |
| pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Centre for Green Technology (CGT)/Centre for Green Technology (CGT) Associate Members | |
| utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | * |
| dc.date.updated | 2025-03-13T03:34:35Z | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | |
| pubs.volume | 248 |
Abstract:
This study assesses the environmental impact of pine chip-based biorefinery processes, focusing on bioethanol, xylonic acid, and lignin production. A cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is employed, comparing a novel biphasic pretreatment method (p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH)/pentanol, Sc-1) with conventional sulfuric acid pretreatment (H2SO4, Sc-2). The analysis spans biomass handling, pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, yeast fermentation, and distillation. Sc-1 yielded an environmental impact of 1.45E+01 kPt, predominantly affecting human health (96.55%), followed by ecosystems (3.07%) and resources (0.38%). Bioethanol, xylonic acid, and lignin contributed 32.61%, 29.28%, and 38.11% to the total environmental burdens, respectively. Sc-2 resulted in an environmental burden of 1.64E+01 kPt, with a primary impact on human health (96.56%) and smaller roles for ecosystems (3.07%) and resources (0.38%). Bioethanol, xylonic acid, and lignin contributed differently at 22.59%, 12.5%, and 64.91%, respectively. Electricity generation was predominant in both scenarios, accounting for 99.05% of the environmental impact, primarily driven by its extensive usage in biomass handling and pretreatment processes. Sc-1 demonstrated a 13.05% lower environmental impact than Sc-2 due to decreased electricity consumption and increased bioethanol and xylonic acid outputs. This study highlights the pivotal role of pretreatment methods in wood-based biorefineries and underscores the urgency of sustainable alternatives like TsOH/pentanol. Additionally, adopting greener electricity generation, advanced technologies, and process optimization are crucial for reducing the environmental footprint of waste-based biorefineries while preserving valuable bioproduct production.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph
