When science meets strategic realpolitik: The case of the Copenhagen UN climate change summit

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2011, 22 (7), pp. 682 - 697
Issue Date:
2011-10-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2011003516OK.pdf460.36 kB
Adobe PDF
This paper argues that the impasse over tackling climate change at the 2009 climate change summit is a result of the outcome of the prevailing power and politics at the summit. The paper discusses the sociological literature on power and notes that the failure of the summit illustrates the fragility of legitimacy and authority. The paper rehearses key parts of the chronology of the summit and argues that the politics of domination often prevail over the politics of legitimacy. Moreover, the way in which both science and politics have failed to legitimate the issue of climate change is explored. The paper closes with a discussion of what is required to fix the issue as legitimate and meriting serious action by major international agencies and economies. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: