Quantifying the Size of Wellbeing and Financial Consequences in Elective Surgery in Australian Hospitals: A Patient's Perspective

Publication Type:
Thesis
Issue Date:
2025
Full metadata record
π—œπ—»π˜π—Ώπ—Όπ—±π˜‚π—°π˜π—Άπ—Όπ—» This thesis provides an overview of elective survey consequences in terms of complications and avoidable readmissions. Despite the broad impact complications could have on societal and health systems, this thesis aims to examine the duration and potential parameters of outcomes, such as out-of-pocket costs and changes in quality of life from patients' perspectives. π— π—²π˜π—΅π—Όπ—±π˜€ Systematic review and mixed-methods study addressed financial and wellbeing outcomes from the perspectives of patients and clinicians. Analysis on quantitative hospital linked data and qualitative survey responses demonstrates magnitude and patterns of postoperative care and unplanned readmissions. π—₯π—²π˜€π˜‚π—Ήπ˜π˜€ Findings concluded aged over 80, requiring an interpreter or mental health assistance, are prominent factors for 28-day unplanned readmissions after surgery, resulting in extended hospital stay of 16.45 days, longer ICU hours and 12.5 times hospitalisation costs. Language used at home and type of hospital admission associate with 90-day readmission. Survey reported wound dressing session lasts approximately 30 minutes, while complications lead to extra sessions taking up to at least two months. π—–π—Όπ—»π—°π—Ήπ˜‚π˜€π—Άπ—Όπ—» Further investigations should extend beyond perioperative prevention and standardised hospitalisation parameters. Examining postoperative care and the interrelationship between socioeconomic characteristics and stakeholder involvement could help avoid disparities in knowledge, informing practical interventions for better decision-making and streamlined care.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: