Climate change - whose responsibility? : from the personal to the global
- Publication Type:
- Thesis
- Issue Date:
- 2012
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Whilst over twenty years of international negotiations have failed to generate a global
agreement to prevent dangerous climate change, increasingly governments are calling
on their citizens to take responsibility for climate change within their households and
lifestyles. This individualisation of responsibility positions climate change action at the
centre of personal lifestyle choice and individual behaviour. If we are to accept this,
then in what ways are individuals equipped to enact their responsibility towards climate
change? What forms of agency do actors require and in what ways are these individual
agencies responsive to the constraints of our presently unsustainable society?
In this thesis I undertake a transdisciplinary exploration of these questions drawing from
five areas of theory (political; social; psychological; philosophical and cultural) that are
concerned with the role of individual agency in climate change response. Each of these
theoretical perspectives raises questions about the social, political and cultural contexts
through which societal change is mediated. From them I argue that the individualisation
of responsibility emphasises individual agency over structural responsibility (after
Middlemiss 2010) and that existing theories fail to inform us why certain individuals are
enabled to take action on climate change. Further, I identify three constraints to
individual agency in relation to climate change mitigation. I propose that individual
agents, in coming together in small groups express forms of collective agency which
overcome these constraints.
I tested these hypotheses through my empirical research. My multiple case study
consisting of eight Australian Climate Action Groups (CAGs) reveals two essential
divergences between members of CAGs and others in the community. Firstly, under the
conditions of risk (Beck 1992) individual actors either: take action around climate
change; or otherwise express denial and/or disempowerment. Secondly, those engaged
in climate change as an issue either: take individual responsibility for climate change
action, reflected in their personal and private sphere behaviour; or, having overcome the
constraints to agency, take collective responsibility for climate change reflected through
political action in the public sphere.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: