Patients' views and experiences of pro re nata medication in acute mental health settings
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2012, 21 (6), pp. 533 - 539
- Issue Date:
- 2012-12-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011006267OK.pdf | 312.78 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
In the present study, we interviewed 40 patients in acute inpatient mental health settings regarding their experience of, and views about, receiving pro re nata (PRN) medication. Patient requests for PRN were primarily to relieve anxiety or to aid sleep, and the majority of the participants (80%) could describe a situation where this medication was very helpful. From the perspective of patients, interactions surrounding the immediate administration of PRN medication were inadequate, in that half of the interviewees were simply told to take the medication, and three-quarters said that, in their experience, formal consent was not commonly sought. Three-quarters of respondents came up with alternatives to PRN, and half wanted more information about the medication itself. These findings could contribute to improved nursing assessment for PRN medication need, administration, and monitoring. © 2012 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: