Evidence? What Evidence? Government Policy Development and the Northern Territory Intervention

Vivian, AM

Evidence? What Evidence? Government Policy Development and the Northern Territory Intervention

Vivian, AM

Permalink

Publisher:: Jumbunna IHl Research Unit UTS
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Ngiya: Talk the Law, 2012, 3 (1), pp. 13 - 57
Issue Date:: 2012-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2012002298OK.pdf		2.64 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Vivian, AM https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7177-0809	en_US
dc.date.issued	2012-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Ngiya: Talk the Law, 2012, 3 (1), pp. 13 - 57	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1834-769X	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/23457
dc.description.abstract	Notwithstanding governments' assertions to thc contrary, the gap between the evidence of what provides sustainable economic, social and cultural outcomes for Aboriginal and Torrcs Strait Islander peoples', and government policies appears to be widening. Consecutive Australian Governmcnts have stated and continue to argue that they arc committcd to an evidencc-based approach to developing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander policy. They claim to have rejected ideological based policy in order to 'look to the cvidence of what works and what does not work' to 'what is successful in overcoming indigenous disadvantage" Howcvcr, rarely does any government idcntifY the evidence that provides the basis for policy. This paper seeks to identifY the principles - emerging from thc evidence - that should frame Indigenous policy.	en_US
dc.publisher	Jumbunna IHl Research Unit UTS	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Ngiya: Talk the Law	en_US
dc.title	Evidence? What Evidence? Government Policy Development and the Northern Territory Intervention	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	1	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	3	en_US
utslib.for	180101 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Law	en_US
utslib.for	1699 Other Studies in Human Society	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
utslib.for	2003 Language Studies	en_US
dc.location.activity	Istanbul, Turkey
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost/Jumbunna
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - SIC - Strengthening Indigenous Communities
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.issue	1	en_US
pubs.volume	3	en_US

Abstract:

Notwithstanding governments' assertions to thc contrary, the gap between the evidence of what provides sustainable economic, social and cultural outcomes for Aboriginal and Torrcs Strait Islander peoples', and government policies appears to be widening. Consecutive Australian Governmcnts have stated and continue to argue that they arc committcd to an evidencc-based approach to developing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander policy. They claim to have rejected ideological based policy in order to 'look to the cvidence of what works and what does not work' to 'what is successful in overcoming indigenous disadvantage" Howcvcr, rarely does any government idcntifY the evidence that provides the basis for policy. This paper seeks to identifY the principles - emerging from thc evidence - that should frame Indigenous policy.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/23457