Validity And Reliability Of The Session-Rpe Method For Quantifying Training In Australian Football: A Comparison Of The Cr10 And Cr100 Scales

Publisher:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Journal Of Strength And Conditioning Research, 2013, 27 (1), pp. 270 - 276
Issue Date:
2013-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2013001116OK.pdf147.99 kB
Adobe PDF
The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the CR10 and CR100 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scales for team sport athletes that undertake high-intensity, intermittent exercise. Twenty-one male Australian football (AF) players (age: 19.0 ± 1.8 years, body mass: 83.92 ± 7.88 kg) participated the first part (part A) of this study, which examined the construct validity of the session-RPE (sRPE) method for quantifying training load in AF. Ten male athletes (age: 16.1 ± 0.5 years) participated in the second part of the study (part B), which compared the test-retest reliability of the CR10 and CR100 RPE scales. In part A, the validity of the sRPE method was assessed by examining the relationships between sRPE, and objective measures of internal (i.e., heart rate) and external training load (i.e., distance traveled), collected from AF training sessions. Part B of the study assessed the reliability of sRPE through examining the test-retest reliability of sRPE during 3 different intensities of controlled intermittent running (10, 11.5, and 13 km·h-1).
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: