The effects of recovery interventions on consecutive days of intermittent sprint exercise

King, M; Duffield, R

The effects of recovery interventions on consecutive days of intermittent sprint exercise

King, M Duffield, R

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2009, 23 (6), pp. 1795 - 1802
Issue Date:: 2009-09-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2012006515OK.pdf		243.62 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	King, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Duffield, R https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5641-1314	en_US
dc.date.issued	2009-09-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2009, 23 (6), pp. 1795 - 1802	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1064-8011	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/28475
dc.description.abstract	The purpose of this study was to compare four recovery interventions following simulated team sport, intermittent-sprint exercise on consecutive days. Ten female netball players performed four randomized sessions of a simulated netball exercise circuit on consecutive days. Each condition consisted of two identical sessions (Session 1 and 2), with the recovery intervention implemented at the completion of Session 1. Participants performed all interventions involving: passive recovery, active recovery (ACT), cold water immersion (CWI) and contrast water therapy (CTWT). No significant differences (p > 0.05) were evident between conditions for exercise performance (vertical jump, 20-m sprint, 10-m sprint, total circuit time) during Session 2. Effect size data indicated trends for an ameliorated decline in 5 X 20-m sprints and vertical jump for CTWT and CWI, respectively. C T demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.04) in lactate post-intervention compared to ACT recovery. Further, ACT recovery resulted in a significantly elevated (p < 0.01) heart rate compared to all other conditions postintervention and demonstrated significantly higher (p < 0.01) rating of perceived exertion postintervention and muscle soreness pre- exercise Session 2. It is likely that while interventions may be applicable to team sport practices, the 24-hour recovery period between exercise bouts was sufficient to allow performance to be maintained, regardless of recovery interventions. © 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3f81f	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Sport Sciences	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Humans	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Exercise	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Hydrotherapy	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Physical Endurance	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Running	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Time Factors	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Physical Fitness	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Adult	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Female	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Cold Temperature	en_US
dc.title	The effects of recovery interventions on consecutive days of intermittent sprint exercise	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	6	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	23	en_US
utslib.for	1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences	en_US
utslib.for	1116 Medical Physiology	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Sports and Exercise Science
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHSP - Health Services and Practice
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	6	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	23	en_US

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to compare four recovery interventions following simulated team sport, intermittent-sprint exercise on consecutive days. Ten female netball players performed four randomized sessions of a simulated netball exercise circuit on consecutive days. Each condition consisted of two identical sessions (Session 1 and 2), with the recovery intervention implemented at the completion of Session 1. Participants performed all interventions involving: passive recovery, active recovery (ACT), cold water immersion (CWI) and contrast water therapy (CTWT). No significant differences (p > 0.05) were evident between conditions for exercise performance (vertical jump, 20-m sprint, 10-m sprint, total circuit time) during Session 2. Effect size data indicated trends for an ameliorated decline in 5 X 20-m sprints and vertical jump for CTWT and CWI, respectively. C T demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.04) in lactate post-intervention compared to ACT recovery. Further, ACT recovery resulted in a significantly elevated (p < 0.01) heart rate compared to all other conditions postintervention and demonstrated significantly higher (p < 0.01) rating of perceived exertion postintervention and muscle soreness pre- exercise Session 2. It is likely that while interventions may be applicable to team sport practices, the 24-hour recovery period between exercise bouts was sufficient to allow performance to be maintained, regardless of recovery interventions. © 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/28475