An experimental study of collective deliberation
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Econometrica, 2011, 79 (3), pp. 893 - 921
- Issue Date:
- 2011-05-01
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012005034OK.pdf | 452.96 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
We study the effects of deliberation on collective decisions. In a series of experiments, we vary groups' preference distributions (between common and conflicting interests) and the institutions by which decisions are reached (simple majority, two-thirds majority, and unanimity). Without deliberation, different institutions generate significantly different outcomes, tracking the theoretical comparative statics. Deliberation, however, significantly diminishes institutional differences and uniformly improves efficiency. Furthermore, communication protocols exhibit an array of stable attributes: messages are public, consistently reveal private information, provide a good predictor for ultimate group choices, and follow particular (endogenous) sequencing. © 2011 The Econometric Society.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: