The joint effect of investor protection and big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Contemporary Accounting Research, 2008, 25 (1), pp. 157 - 191
- Issue Date:
- 2008-01-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2013006796OK.pdf | 153.78 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
The association of a country's investor protection regime with the quality of reported earnings is examined for a large sample of firms from 42 countries. Three attributes of earnings are evaluated: the magnitude of signed abnormal accruals, the likelihood of reporting losses, and accounting conservatism (timely loss recognition). We find that earnings quality increases for firms with Big 4 auditors when a country's investor protection regime gives stronger protection to investors; specifically, signed abnormal accruals are smaller, there is a greater likelihood of reporting losses, and accounting conservatism is greater. In contrast, earnings of firms with non-Big 4 auditors are largely unaffected by different investor protection regimes. The study adds to a growing body of research showing that accounting practices are influenced by a country's institutions. However, our results differ from prior studies by demonstrating that country-level effects on earnings quality are mediated by audit enforcement and, in particular, the incentives of Big 4 auditors to perform higher quality audits in countries with stricter investor protection regimes. © CAAA.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: