The quality of accruals and earnings : the role of components of accrual estimation errors

Publication Type:
Thesis
Issue Date:
2010
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail01front.pdf333.87 kB
Adobe PDF
Thumbnail02whole.pdf12.9 MB
Adobe PDF
I investigate the quality of accrual components by employing the approach used by Dechow and Dichev (2002) to measure the quality of aggregate accruals and extending it to identifiable components of accruals. I provide some initial evidence concerning components of accruals and to what extent the quality of specific accruals components contributes to overall accrual quality. The initial results indicate that Australian firms exhibit similar aggregate accruals behaviour and characteristics to those reported by Dechow and Dichev. Relating to accrual component quality, I find that quality measures relating to receivables and supplier/employee costs generally are associated with firm characteristics, such as operating environment volatility, size, and length of operating cycle, in a manner similar to aggregate accruals quality. Other accrual component quality measures, however, do not appear systematically associated with any firm characteristics. The results also indicate that the aggregate accruals quality measure is consistently and strongly positively associated with the quality of supplier/employee-related accruals, though primarily for firms which report large magnitude working capital changes over time. Interestingly, the same firms tend to exhibit a negative association between aggregate accruals quality and receivables-related quality. Thus, for my sample of Australian firms it appears that aggregate accruals quality is largely driven by the quality of accruals for costs relating to suppliers and employees, rather than revenues.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: