The Promise of Regional Governance for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Reilly, A	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Behrendt, LY https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-7273	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Williams, G	en_US
dc.contributor.author	McCausland, R	en_US
dc.contributor.author	McMillan, MD	en_US
dc.date.issued	2007-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Ngiya: Talk the Law, 2007, 1 pp. 126 - 166	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1834-769X	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3281
dc.description.abstract	From the time the Whitlam Govemment introduced 'self-determination' as its policy framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, there have been many legislative versions of what this means in practice. This debate about how Indigenous people's interestsa nd needsc an be best representedin legislation has re-emerged after the Federal Government's announcement of the abolition of ATSIC and its Regional Councils.' Both Indigenous peoples and governments continue to struggle with the question of representation in the context of policy formulation, funding arrangements, accountability, regulation, service delivery and Indigenous peoples' human rights.	en_US
dc.publisher	Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning (Research Unit), UTS	en_US
dc.relation	http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP0560613R1
dc.relation.ispartof	Ngiya: Talk the Law	en_US
dc.title	The Promise of Regional Governance for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	1	en_US
utslib.for	180101 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Law	en_US
utslib.for	180108 Constitutional Law	en_US
utslib.for	1699 Other Studies in Human Society	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
utslib.for	2003 Language Studies	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost/Jumbunna
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - SIC - Strengthening Indigenous Communities
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.volume	1	en_US

Abstract:

From the time the Whitlam Govemment introduced 'self-determination' as its policy framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, there have been many legislative versions of what this means in practice. This debate about how Indigenous people's interestsa nd needsc an be best representedin legislation has re-emerged after the Federal Government's announcement of the abolition of ATSIC and its Regional Councils.' Both Indigenous peoples and governments continue to struggle with the question of representation in the context of policy formulation, funding arrangements, accountability, regulation, service delivery and Indigenous peoples' human rights.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3281