Women's knowledge, expectations and experience of induction of labour and the association with maternal anxiety

Jadidi, S

Women's knowledge, expectations and experience of induction of labour and the association with maternal anxiety

Jadidi, S

Permalink

Publication Type:: Thesis
Issue Date:: 2012

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download contents and abstractAdobe PDF (4.65 MB)

Adobe PDF

Download thesisAdobe PDF (106.15 MB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Jadidi, S
dc.date.accessioned	2015-03-03T02:40:50Z
dc.date.available	2015-03-03T02:40:50Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/33998
dc.description	University of Technology, Sydney. Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Induction of Labour (IOL) is one of the fastest growing procedures in childbirth in the developed world with one in four women now being induced. The primary purpose of this study was to further develop the understanding of women's knowledge, expectations and experiences of IOL in order to identify whether women's views may be contributing factors to the increasing rate of IOL. A descriptive and correlational study design, using pre and post IOL surveys, captured the views of a convenience sample of pregnant women booked for any type of IOL at Blacktown Hospital in 2009 and 2010. Consenting women were given self-administered, pre and post-IOL questionnaires and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. One hundred and nine women experienced IOL and completed both pre and post IOL surveys; of these, 98 linked surveys were eligible to be analysed using SPSS v 18. Both simple descriptive and multivariate analyses were undertaken. The majority of participants (85.7%) acknowledged they agreed to have an IOL because they were worried about problems with their baby if the pregnancy continued. Most (59.1%) acknowledged a midwife as their most important care provider as well as the most common source of information (61.2%). Although 96.9% of women expressed the importance of information concerning IOL, only 75% were satisfied with the information they received prior to the process. While the majority of participants (97.9%) were satisfied with the care they received from midwives, overall, 13.4% did not have a satisfying IOL experience. More than 21% of women expected to give birth within six hours and only 15% of participants expressed the length of their labour was around what they expected. While 7.1% came with no expectation regarding labour pain, 67.8% rated their pain as 'much more/ more painful' than they expected. These results revealed that many women did not have realistic expectations of IOL. Satisfaction with childbirth was higher for women who had a birth experience that was better than expected. In addition, there was a significant relationship between women's realistic expectations and their satisfaction with IOL. However a positive relationship between women's knowledge and their satisfaction with IOL was not found in this study. There was a significant relationship between women's level of knowledge and their State anxiety level before undergoing IOL. Furthermore women who had more realistic expectations were less anxious after experiencing IOL. Being well informed by the midwife was the strongest predictor for satisfaction in this study (p<O.OO 1 ). In addition those participants who had more realistic expectations were less anxious after their IOL. The results of this study add to our understanding of women's wishes and views towards induction of labour within an Australian context. The importance of being well informed by the midwife suggests a professional responsibility to ensure that women are provided with accurate and timely information regarding IOL in order to set realistic expectations to achieve a positive childbirth experience.	en_US
dc.format	Thesis (MMid Res)	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.relation	https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/33998/8/02Whole.pdf
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights	The author owns the copyright in this thesis including all reproduction and reuse rights for the work. The work may not be altered without the permission of the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from this thesis.
dc.rights	au.edu.uts.lib/ppc
dc.rights	© 2012 Soheila Jadidi
dc.title	Women's knowledge, expectations and experience of induction of labour and the association with maternal anxiety	en_US
dc.type	Thesis
utslib.copyright.status	open_access

Abstract:

Induction of Labour (IOL) is one of the fastest growing procedures in childbirth in the developed world with one in four women now being induced. The primary purpose of this study was to further develop the understanding of women's knowledge, expectations and experiences of IOL in order to identify whether women's views may be contributing factors to the increasing rate of IOL. A descriptive and correlational study design, using pre and post IOL surveys, captured the views of a convenience sample of pregnant women booked for any type of IOL at Blacktown Hospital in 2009 and 2010. Consenting women were given self-administered, pre and post-IOL questionnaires and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. One hundred and nine women experienced IOL and completed both pre and post IOL surveys; of these, 98 linked surveys were eligible to be analysed using SPSS v 18. Both simple descriptive and multivariate analyses were undertaken. The majority of participants (85.7%) acknowledged they agreed to have an IOL because they were worried about problems with their baby if the pregnancy continued. Most (59.1%) acknowledged a midwife as their most important care provider as well as the most common source of information (61.2%). Although 96.9% of women expressed the importance of information concerning IOL, only 75% were satisfied with the information they received prior to the process. While the majority of participants (97.9%) were satisfied with the care they received from midwives, overall, 13.4% did not have a satisfying IOL experience. More than 21% of women expected to give birth within six hours and only 15% of participants expressed the length of their labour was around what they expected. While 7.1% came with no expectation regarding labour pain, 67.8% rated their pain as 'much more/ more painful' than they expected. These results revealed that many women did not have realistic expectations of IOL. Satisfaction with childbirth was higher for women who had a birth experience that was better than expected. In addition, there was a significant relationship between women's realistic expectations and their satisfaction with IOL. However a positive relationship between women's knowledge and their satisfaction with IOL was not found in this study. There was a significant relationship between women's level of knowledge and their State anxiety level before undergoing IOL. Furthermore women who had more realistic expectations were less anxious after experiencing IOL. Being well informed by the midwife was the strongest predictor for satisfaction in this study (p

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/33998