Plagiarism and registered health professionals: navigating the borderlands between scholarly and professional misconduct.

Wardle, J

Plagiarism and registered health professionals: navigating the borderlands between scholarly and professional misconduct.

Wardle, J

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of law and medicine, 2013, 21 (2), pp. 399 - 414
Issue Date:: 2013-01-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2013004303OK.pdf		464.95 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wardle, J https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-3542	en_US
dc.date.issued	2013-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of law and medicine, 2013, 21 (2), pp. 399 - 414	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1320-159X	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/28517
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/37274
dc.description.abstract	As access to published materials becomes more readily available, the ability to plagiarise material, deliberately or unwittingly has become easier than ever. This article explores important recent decisions in Australia and the United Kingdom regarding registered health practitioners who have engaged in plagiarism, both related and unrelated to their clinical practice, and explores the ways in which regulatory authorities in these countries have viewed scholarly misconduct committed by registered health professionals. This article also examines the implications of plagiarism for the registered health professions, and makes suggestions for strategies to reduce its influence and incidence in modern clinical practice.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of law and medicine	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Humans	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Scientific Misconduct	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Plagiarism	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Health Personnel	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Licensure	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Australia	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	United Kingdom	en_US
dc.title	Plagiarism and registered health professionals: navigating the borderlands between scholarly and professional misconduct.	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	21	en_US
utslib.for	2201 Applied Ethics	en_US
utslib.for	11 Medical and Health Sciences	en_US
utslib.for	18 Law and Legal Studies	en_US
utslib.for	22 Philosophy and Religious Studies	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHSP - Health Services and Practice
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	2	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	21	en_US

Abstract:

As access to published materials becomes more readily available, the ability to plagiarise material, deliberately or unwittingly has become easier than ever. This article explores important recent decisions in Australia and the United Kingdom regarding registered health practitioners who have engaged in plagiarism, both related and unrelated to their clinical practice, and explores the ways in which regulatory authorities in these countries have viewed scholarly misconduct committed by registered health professionals. This article also examines the implications of plagiarism for the registered health professions, and makes suggestions for strategies to reduce its influence and incidence in modern clinical practice.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/28517