Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research

Brew, A; Boud, D; Namgung, SU; Lucas, L; Crawford, K

Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research

Brew, A Boud, D

Namgung, SU Lucas, L Crawford, K

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Higher Education, 2016, 71 (5), pp. 681 - 697
Issue Date:: 2016-05-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Accepted Manuscript VersionAdobe PDF (460.9 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Brew, A	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Boud, D https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-2722	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Namgung, SU	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Lucas, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Crawford, K	en_US
dc.date.available	2020-05-25T19:13:56Z
dc.date.issued	2016-05-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Higher Education, 2016, 71 (5), pp. 681 - 697	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0018-1560	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/43265
dc.description.abstract	© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. This paper asks the question: do people with different levels of research productivity and identification as a researcher think of research differently? It discusses a study that differentiated levels of research productivity among English and Australian academics working in research-intensive environments in three broad discipline areas: science, engineering and technology; social science and humanities; and medicine and health sciences. The paper explores the different conceptions of research held by these academics in terms of their levels of research productivity, their levels of research training, whether they considered themselves an active researcher and a member of a research team, and their disciplinary differences.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Higher Education	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/s10734-015-9930-6	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Education	en_US
dc.title	Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	5	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	71	en_US
utslib.for	1303 Specialist Studies in Education	en_US
utslib.for	1301 Education Systems	en_US
utslib.for	1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/FASS Faculty Administration
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.issue	5	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	71	en_US

Abstract:

© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. This paper asks the question: do people with different levels of research productivity and identification as a researcher think of research differently? It discusses a study that differentiated levels of research productivity among English and Australian academics working in research-intensive environments in three broad discipline areas: science, engineering and technology; social science and humanities; and medicine and health sciences. The paper explores the different conceptions of research held by these academics in terms of their levels of research productivity, their levels of research training, whether they considered themselves an active researcher and a member of a research team, and their disciplinary differences.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/43265