Spinal pain: Current understanding, trends, and the future of care

Parkin-Smith, GF; Amorin-Woods, LG; Davies, SJ; Elosco, B; Adams, J

Spinal pain: Current understanding, trends, and the future of care

Parkin-Smith, GF Amorin-Woods, LG Davies, SJ Elosco, B Adams, J

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Pain Research, 2015, 8 pp. 741 - 752
Issue Date:: 2015-01-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published VersionAdobe PDF (285.59 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Parkin-Smith, GF	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Amorin-Woods, LG	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Davies, SJ	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Elosco, B	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Adams, J https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9901-5717	en_US
dc.date.issued	2015-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Pain Research, 2015, 8 pp. 741 - 752	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1178-7090	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/43636
dc.description.abstract	© 2015 Trainor et al. This commissioned review paper offers a summary of our current understanding of nonmalignant spinal pain, particularly persistent pain. Spinal pain can be a complex problem, requiring management that addresses both the physical and psychosocial components of the pain experience. We propose a model of care that includes the necessary components of care services that would address the multidimensional nature of spinal pain. Emerging care services that tailor care to the individual person with pain seems to achieve better outcomes and greater consumer satisfaction with care, while most likely containing costs. However, we recommend that any model of care and care framework should be developed on the basis of a multidisciplinary approach to care, with the scaffold being the principles of evidence-based practice. Importantly, we propose that any care services recommended in new models or frameworks be matched with available resources and services-this matching we promote as the fourth principle of evidence-based practice. Ongoing research will be necessary to offer insight into clinical outcomes of complex interventions, while practice-based research would uncover consumer needs and workforce capacity. This kind of research data is essential to inform health care policy and practice.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Pain Research	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.2147/JPR.S55600	en_US
dc.title	Spinal pain: Current understanding, trends, and the future of care	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	8	en_US
utslib.for	1103 Clinical Sciences	en_US
utslib.for	1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CHSP - Health Services and Practice
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	8	en_US

Abstract:

© 2015 Trainor et al. This commissioned review paper offers a summary of our current understanding of nonmalignant spinal pain, particularly persistent pain. Spinal pain can be a complex problem, requiring management that addresses both the physical and psychosocial components of the pain experience. We propose a model of care that includes the necessary components of care services that would address the multidimensional nature of spinal pain. Emerging care services that tailor care to the individual person with pain seems to achieve better outcomes and greater consumer satisfaction with care, while most likely containing costs. However, we recommend that any model of care and care framework should be developed on the basis of a multidisciplinary approach to care, with the scaffold being the principles of evidence-based practice. Importantly, we propose that any care services recommended in new models or frameworks be matched with available resources and services-this matching we promote as the fourth principle of evidence-based practice. Ongoing research will be necessary to offer insight into clinical outcomes of complex interventions, while practice-based research would uncover consumer needs and workforce capacity. This kind of research data is essential to inform health care policy and practice.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/43636