Habitat and Habitus: Boxed-in versus Box-Breaking Research
- SAGE Publications
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Organization Studies, 2014, 35 (7), pp. 967 - 987
- Issue Date:
|Habitat and Habitus_Boxed-in versus Box-Breaking Research.pdf||Published Version||403.68 kB|
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
This paper argues that scholarly work is increasingly situated in narrowly circumscribed areas of study, which are encouraging specialization, incremental adding-to-the-literature contributions and a blinkered mindset. Researchers invest considerable time and energy in these specialized areas in order to maximize their productivity and career prospects. We refer to this way of doing research and structuring careers as boxed-in research. While such research is normally portrayed as a template for good scholarship, it gives rise to significant problems in management and organization studies, as it tends to generate a shortage of novel and influential ideas. We propose box-breaking research as a strategy for how researchers and institutions can move away from the prevalence of boxed-in research and, thus, be able to generate more imaginative and influential research results. We suggest three versions: box changing, box jumping and, more ambitiously, box transcendence.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: