Theory verses empiricism in health economics: An analysis of the past 20 years
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- European Journal of Health Economics, 2003, 4 (2), pp. 90 - 95
- Issue Date:
- 2003-07-23
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2003000777.pdf | 911.22 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
We report the results of a study analyzing the proportion of theoretical and empirical articles in two core health economics journals. The Journal of Health Economics published 30% theory during the period 1982-1986, but by 1997-2001 the proportion had risen to 40% theory. Health Economics published 38% theory during 1992-1996, but the proportion fell to 32% theory during 1997-2001. In both journals articles were more likely to be published by men (78%), and published women were 50% less likely to publish theory than were men. Articles were more likely to be published by United States authors (54%), but United States authors were less likely to publish theory than authors from other countries. Compared to other disciplines, health economics published a higher proportion of theory than sociology, chemistry, and physics but less than economics and political science.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: