How Standard are Standards: An Examination of Language Emphasis in Project Management Standards

Crawford, L; Pollack, JB; England, D

How Standard are Standards: An Examination of Language Emphasis in Project Management Standards

Crawford, L Pollack, JB

England, D

Permalink

Publisher:: Project Management Institute
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Project Management Journal, 2007, 38 (3), pp. 6 - 21
Issue Date:: 2007-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2007002366.pdf		7.1 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Crawford, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Pollack, JB https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8879-9408	en_US
dc.contributor.author	England, D	en_US
dc.date.issued	2007-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Project Management Journal, 2007, 38 (3), pp. 6 - 21	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	8756-9728	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6281
dc.description.abstract	In light of current work toward the development of global standards for project management, this paper analyzes differences between a selection of various countries' existing project management standards. The analysis is conducted using computational corpus linguistics techniques, resulting in the identification of similarities and differences between the standards of five countries.	en_US
dc.publisher	Project Management Institute	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Project Management Journal	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1002/pmj.20002	en_US
dc.title	How Standard are Standards: An Examination of Language Emphasis in Project Management Standards	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	3	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	38	en_US
utslib.for	120201 Building Construction Management and Project Planning	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
utslib.for	1202 Building	en_US
utslib.for	1503 Business and Management	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Architecture
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Built Environment
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCG - Centre for Corporate Governance
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CMOS - Centre for Management and Organisation Studies
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.issue	3	en_US
pubs.volume	38	en_US

Abstract:

In light of current work toward the development of global standards for project management, this paper analyzes differences between a selection of various countries' existing project management standards. The analysis is conducted using computational corpus linguistics techniques, resulting in the identification of similarities and differences between the standards of five countries.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6281