Development and evaluation of a CAI course in Information Technology for Life at Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University, Thailand
- Publication Type:
- Thesis
- Issue Date:
- 2006
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether computer assisted instruction (CAI) in
the Information Technology for Life course taken by first year students at Nakhon Pathom
Rajabhat University (NPRU), Thailand, could be used to teach at least as effectively as
traditional methods. Since CAI has been used successfully in developed countries to
supplement or replace traditional methods of instruction, it was thought that CAI may
present a solution to the lack of instructors in general education courses across the 41
Rajabhat Universities in Thailand. CAI could also facilitate student centred learning, a
key goal of the National Education Act (1999).
One hundred and twenty four incoming freshman students enrolled at NPRU for the
2004 academic year participated in a study comparing the two methods of instruction using
three topics of the Information Technology for Life course. The research questions
examined were (1) are there differences between the groups on the achievement factors
related to CAI usage? and (2) are there differences between the groups on attitude factors
related to CAI and traditional teaching? CAI lessons were developed for the experimental
group as interactive multimedia modules loaded from a CD-ROM; the control group
received traditional lecture instruction.
Pre-test and post-test scores indicated greater learning gains in the CAI group. Comparison
of weak, average and strong students between the two groups showed no difference
in learning outcomes for the weak students, but average and strong students in
the CAI group did better than those of the control group. The results also indicated that
CAI students' retention of content was better than that of students following traditional
learning. There was no significant difference in students' attitudes toward their method
of teaching. Students of both groups felt that overall their method of teaching was very
good. No relationship was found between student performance and their attitude toward
CAI.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
