Understanding International Business Negotiation Behaviour: Credible Commitments, Dispute Resolution, and the Role of Institutions

Publisher:
BRILL
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 2016, 21 (1), pp. 165 - 198
Issue Date:
2016-02-08
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
INER_021_01_165-198_Wan-Wang-Ma.pdfPublished Version747.46 kB
Adobe PDF
Developed mainly in the broad field of negotiation, the existing literature on international business negotiation has adopted theoretical perspectives that focus on differences between negotiating parties. In this article, we argue that opportunism is more fundamental than differences in our understanding of international business negotiation behavior. Parties’ concerns over how to mitigate opportunism are the fundamental force that drives such negotiation behavior, and the likelihood of opportunism is affected mostly by the economic nature of the asset parties committed to the business exchange. By synthesizing transaction cost economics and new institutional economics, this paper develops an alternative theoretical model that complements the existing negotiation literature to explain negotiation behavior. Our model theorizes relationships between parties’ ex-ante credible commitments and ex-post dispute resolution strategies and explores how institutions moderate such relationships in shaping international business negotiation behavior and process.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: