Setting the standard : the role of the Australian College of Operating Room Nurses

Hamlin, Lois

Setting the standard : the role of the Australian College of Operating Room Nurses

Hamlin, Lois

Permalink

Publication Type:: Thesis
Issue Date:: 2005

Closed Access

Filename	Size
01Front-vol1.pdf	735.79 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open
01Front-vol2.pdf	365.77 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open
02Whole-vol1.pdf	12.55 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open
02Whole-vol2.pdf	7.95 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Hamlin, Lois
dc.date.accessioned	2017-01-24T23:30:45Z
dc.date.available	2017-01-24T23:30:45Z
dc.date.issued	2005
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/76042
dc.description	University of Technology, Sydney. Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health.	en_AU
dc.description	NO FULL TEXT AVAILABLE. This thesis contains 3rd party copyright material. The hardcopy may be available for consultation at the UTS Library.
dc.description.abstract	NO FULL TEXT AVAILABLE. This thesis contains 3rd party copyright material. ----- The usefulness of professional organisations, including professional perioperative nursing associations, is generally accepted. The focus of the Australian College of Operating Room Nurses (ACORN) is on improving and determining a uniform standard of care within perioperative settings. This thesis presents the results of an evaluation of ACORN undertaken to identify the organisation's role and effectiveness. Broadly speaking, evaluation is about the discovery of the nature and merit or worth of something. The approach chosen to examine ACORN was Parlett and Hamilton's illuminative model from the interpretive paradigm. The value of this flexible evaluation strategy is that it permits further examination of issues that may emerge during the course of an investigation. Data were collected from three broad subject groups. These groups were (1) all perioperative nurses who had attended one of a series of ACORN competency workshops offered in 2000 and 2001; (2) a national sample of perioperative managers; and (3) a small group of current or former ACORN board members. The first two groups were surveyed via questionnaire, and the board members were interviewed. Selected documents were analysed. ACORN demonstrated some of the characteristics of a successful organisation but not all of them. Its most significant and effective achievement was (and remains) the publication of the ACORN Standards, guidelines and policy statements. Organisational weaknesses included little evidence of research activity and limited political activism. Also uncovered during the study were the limitations of one standard, the ACORN counting standard. This is notwithstanding the fact that completing a surgical count during every surgical intervention is the 'gold standard' globally, to help prevent the inadvertent retention of surgical items. In response to these findings and following an analysis of the literature, a framework was developed that permitted a systematic examination and categorisation of the risks associated with this adverse event. Taking a 'systems approach' to managing each of the identified risks is proposed and ways to achieve this are detailed. Other recommendations focus on enhancing those attributes that are associated with successful organisations that ACORN lacks, to increase its efficacy. Additionally, improving the robustness of the ACORN standards, and enhancing their distribution and use is suggested. In conclusion, ACORN's role was determined to be representative as the professional body for perioperative nurses and the production of practice standards were identified as its most significant achievement. Perioperative nurses' beliefs that the standards have a positive effect on nursing practice and patient outcomes attested to this.	en_AU
dc.format	Thesis (PhD)
dc.language.iso	en_AU	en_AU
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.rights	The author owns the copyright in this thesis including all reproduction and reuse rights for the work. The work may not be altered without the permission of the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from this thesis.
dc.title	Setting the standard : the role of the Australian College of Operating Room Nurses	en_AU
dc.type	Thesis	en_AU
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access

Abstract:

NO FULL TEXT AVAILABLE. This thesis contains 3rd party copyright material. ----- The usefulness of professional organisations, including professional perioperative nursing associations, is generally accepted. The focus of the Australian College of Operating Room Nurses (ACORN) is on improving and determining a uniform standard of care within perioperative settings. This thesis presents the results of an evaluation of ACORN undertaken to identify the organisation's role and effectiveness. Broadly speaking, evaluation is about the discovery of the nature and merit or worth of something. The approach chosen to examine ACORN was Parlett and Hamilton's illuminative model from the interpretive paradigm. The value of this flexible evaluation strategy is that it permits further examination of issues that may emerge during the course of an investigation. Data were collected from three broad subject groups. These groups were (1) all perioperative nurses who had attended one of a series of ACORN competency workshops offered in 2000 and 2001; (2) a national sample of perioperative managers; and (3) a small group of current or former ACORN board members. The first two groups were surveyed via questionnaire, and the board members were interviewed. Selected documents were analysed. ACORN demonstrated some of the characteristics of a successful organisation but not all of them. Its most significant and effective achievement was (and remains) the publication of the ACORN Standards, guidelines and policy statements. Organisational weaknesses included little evidence of research activity and limited political activism. Also uncovered during the study were the limitations of one standard, the ACORN counting standard. This is notwithstanding the fact that completing a surgical count during every surgical intervention is the 'gold standard' globally, to help prevent the inadvertent retention of surgical items. In response to these findings and following an analysis of the literature, a framework was developed that permitted a systematic examination and categorisation of the risks associated with this adverse event. Taking a 'systems approach' to managing each of the identified risks is proposed and ways to achieve this are detailed. Other recommendations focus on enhancing those attributes that are associated with successful organisations that ACORN lacks, to increase its efficacy. Additionally, improving the robustness of the ACORN standards, and enhancing their distribution and use is suggested. In conclusion, ACORN's role was determined to be representative as the professional body for perioperative nurses and the production of practice standards were identified as its most significant achievement. Perioperative nurses' beliefs that the standards have a positive effect on nursing practice and patient outcomes attested to this.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/76042