De Finetti on the Insurance of Risks and Uncertainties

Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Type:
Journal Article
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2012, 63 (2), pp. 329 - 356
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Feduzi BJPS 2012.pdfPublished Version206.97 kB
Adobe PDF
In the insurance literature, it is often argued that private markets can provide insurance against ‘risks’ but not against ‘uncertainties’ in the sense of Knight ([1921]) or Keynes ([1921]). This claim is at odds with the standard economic model of risk exchange which, in assuming that decision-makers are always guided by point-valued subjective probabilities, predicts that all uncertainties can, in theory, be insured. Supporters of the standard model argue that the insuring of highly idiosyncratic risks by Lloyd's of London proves that this is so even in practice. The purpose of this article is to show that Bruno de Finetti, famous as one of the three founding fathers of the subjective approach to probability assumed by the standard model, actually made a theoretical case for uncertainty within the subjectivist approach. We draw on empirical evidence from the practice of underwriters to show how this case may help explain the reluctance of insurers to cover highly uncertain contingencies.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: