Review article: Why is there still a debate regarding the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis in the management of presumed acute ischaemic stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Donaldson, L Fitzgerald, E Flower, O Delaney, A

Permalink

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Donaldson_et_al-2016-Emergency_Medicine_Australasia.pdf	Published Version	345.39 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Donaldson, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Fitzgerald, E	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Flower, O	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Delaney, A	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-10	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2016, 28 (5), pp. 496 - 510	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1742-6731	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/90003
dc.language	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Wiley	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Emergency Medicine Australasia	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1111/1742-6723.12653	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Emergency & Critical Care Medicine	en_US
dc.title	Review article: Why is there still a debate regarding the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis in the management of presumed acute ischaemic stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	5	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	28	en_US
utslib.for	1103 Clinical Sciences	en_US
utslib.for	1117 Public Health and Health Services	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	5	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	28	en_US

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: