Access to high-cost drugs: Decision makers' perspectives

Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, 2005, 35 (1), pp. 18 - 20
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2007003477OK.pdf263.94 kB
Adobe PDF
To explore the attitudes, perceptions and concerns among decision makers about equity of access to high-cost drugs in public hospitals. Method: 25 in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior hospital administrators, directors of pharmacy and senior medical doctors. Topics included the decision-making process and associated problems, and solutions to issues of access to high-cost drugs. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Results: Healthcare funding models were perceived as obstacles to equity of access to high-cost drugs. Participants were concerned that there were inequities in decisions for individual patients according to public or private sector status. Tertiary public hospitals were seen to be at the 'cutting edge' and therefore were required to fund new and expensive drugs. This meant prioritising between patient groups and individuals. Participants had difficulty in identifying solutions. They suggested that ethical principles should be considered in addition to safety, efficacy and cost. Most wanted a transparent, accountable, evidence-based decision- making process. Conclusion: Decision makers were concerned about equity of access to high-cost drugs in public hospitals. They were also concerned about processes for decision making and the outcomes of these decisions.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: