The Right to Respond? The Monopolisation of 'Voice' in CMS

University of Leicester
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Ephemera, 2004, 4 (2), pp. 101 - 120
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description SizeFormat
2007003231OK.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDF
This paper explores the power effects of, and possible justifications for, the differential 'voice' and 'silence' accorded academic and non-academic subjects within Critical Management Studies (eMS). I explore these issues through a discussion of the practice of 'giving voice' to some subjects critiqued in eMS journal articles by providing them with the opportunity to publish a 'response'. I question the justification for extending this right only to academic subjects, and use this example to provoke eMS to question further its institutional orientation to issues of voice and silence in relation to the non-academic research subject.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: