The Right to Respond? The Monopolisation of 'Voice' in CMS

Wray-Bliss, E

The Right to Respond? The Monopolisation of 'Voice' in CMS

Wray-Bliss, E

Permalink

Publisher:: University of Leicester
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Ephemera, 2004, 4 (2), pp. 101 - 120
Issue Date:: 2004-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (1.13 MB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wray-Bliss, E	en_US
dc.date.issued	2004-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Ephemera, 2004, 4 (2), pp. 101 - 120	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1473-2866	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/10409
dc.description.abstract	This paper explores the power effects of, and possible justifications for, the differential 'voice' and 'silence' accorded academic and non-academic subjects within Critical Management Studies (eMS). I explore these issues through a discussion of the practice of 'giving voice' to some subjects critiqued in eMS journal articles by providing them with the opportunity to publish a 'response'. I question the justification for extending this right only to academic subjects, and use this example to provoke eMS to question further its institutional orientation to issues of voice and silence in relation to the non-academic research subject.	en_US
dc.publisher	University of Leicester	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Ephemera	en_US
dc.title	The Right to Respond? The Monopolisation of 'Voice' in CMS	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	4	en_US
utslib.for	1605 Policy and Administration	en_US
utslib.for	1503 Business and Management	en_US
utslib.for	2002 Cultural Studies	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.issue	2	en_US
pubs.volume	4	en_US

Abstract:

This paper explores the power effects of, and possible justifications for, the differential 'voice' and 'silence' accorded academic and non-academic subjects within Critical Management Studies (eMS). I explore these issues through a discussion of the practice of 'giving voice' to some subjects critiqued in eMS journal articles by providing them with the opportunity to publish a 'response'. I question the justification for extending this right only to academic subjects, and use this example to provoke eMS to question further its institutional orientation to issues of voice and silence in relation to the non-academic research subject.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/10409