Ultramicroscopy of bone at oral implant sites: a comparison of ED and control patients. Part 1-defining the protocol.
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- The International journal of prosthodontics, 2011, 24 (2), pp. 147 - 154
- Issue Date:
- 2011-03
Closed Access
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Silthampitag, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Klineberg, I | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, AS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Austin, B | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zee, KY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wallace, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Scholz, S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Naim, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zoud, K | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2011-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The International journal of prosthodontics, 2011, 24 (2), pp. 147 - 154 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0893-2174 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/118169 | |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a protocol to analyze the microstructure of mandibular and maxillary bone in association with implant placement in ectodermal dysplasia (ED) and anodontia conditions compared to patients not suffering from such conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was not additionally invasive, since the bone harvesting was completed at the time and site of implant placement. Bone samples were allocated into two groups (ED and control patients) and specified by the site of bone harvesting. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis at 5-Μm resolution was conducted on each bone sample. Computer analysis applying specialized CT analysis and software allowed evaluation of the three-dimensional microstructure of alveolar and basal bone samples for comparison of structural parameters. RESULTS: Ten bone samples (five alveolar and five basal) were harvested. Preliminary data confirmed the structural features and significant differences between alveolar and basal bone. Basal bone had greater absolute and percent bone volume, greater bone surface, and a lower trabecular bone pattern factor than alveolar bone. CONCLUSION: Preliminary data were derived from bone harvested from both the maxilla and mandible of control patients, while bone samples from ED patients were harvested from only the anterior mandible. Further bone samples will provide more data on whether broader areas of bone harvesting, age, or sex affect the quality and quantity of the bone and influence implant treatment outcomes. | en_US |
dc.format | en_US | |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | The International journal of prosthodontics | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Process | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mandible | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Maxilla | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Anodontia | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Tooth Diseases | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ectodermal Dysplasia | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Imaging, Three-Dimensional | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Organ Size | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Oral Hygiene Index | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontal Index | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Vertical Dimension | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Density | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Surface Properties | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Image Processing, Computer-Assisted | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Software | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | X-Ray Microtomography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Young Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Process | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Anodontia | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Density | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ectodermal Dysplasia | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Image Processing, Computer-Assisted | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Imaging, Three-Dimensional | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mandible | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Maxilla | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Oral Hygiene Index | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Organ Size | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontal Index | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Software | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Surface Properties | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Tooth Diseases | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Vertical Dimension | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | X-Ray Microtomography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Young Adult | en_US |
dc.title | Ultramicroscopy of bone at oral implant sites: a comparison of ED and control patients. Part 1-defining the protocol. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.description.version | Published | en_US |
utslib.citation.volume | 2 | en_US |
utslib.citation.volume | 24 | en_US |
utslib.for | 1105 Dentistry | en_US |
utslib.for | 1105 Dentistry | en_US |
utslib.for | 0903 Biomedical Engineering | en_US |
pubs.embargo.period | Not known | en_US |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Science | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Science/School of Life Sciences | |
utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | |
pubs.issue | 2 | en_US |
pubs.publication-status | Published | en_US |
pubs.volume | 24 | en_US |
Files in This Item:
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC-10011110.pdf | Published Version | 2.44 MB | Adobe PDF |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a protocol to analyze the microstructure of mandibular and maxillary bone in association with implant placement in ectodermal dysplasia (ED) and anodontia conditions compared to patients not suffering from such conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was not additionally invasive, since the bone harvesting was completed at the time and site of implant placement. Bone samples were allocated into two groups (ED and control patients) and specified by the site of bone harvesting. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis at 5-Μm resolution was conducted on each bone sample. Computer analysis applying specialized CT analysis and software allowed evaluation of the three-dimensional microstructure of alveolar and basal bone samples for comparison of structural parameters. RESULTS: Ten bone samples (five alveolar and five basal) were harvested. Preliminary data confirmed the structural features and significant differences between alveolar and basal bone. Basal bone had greater absolute and percent bone volume, greater bone surface, and a lower trabecular bone pattern factor than alveolar bone. CONCLUSION: Preliminary data were derived from bone harvested from both the maxilla and mandible of control patients, while bone samples from ED patients were harvested from only the anterior mandible. Further bone samples will provide more data on whether broader areas of bone harvesting, age, or sex affect the quality and quantity of the bone and influence implant treatment outcomes.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: