Making New Environmental Knowledges: EIAs and Public Hearings on Large Dams in Northeast India

Menon, Manju

Making New Environmental Knowledges: EIAs and Public Hearings on Large Dams in Northeast India

Menon, Manju

Permalink

Publication Type:: Thesis
Issue Date:: 2020

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download contents and abstractAdobe PDF (142.12 kB)

Adobe PDF

Download thesisAdobe PDF (3.09 MB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Menon, Manju
dc.date.accessioned	2020-04-24T01:58:22Z
dc.date.available	2020-04-24T01:58:22Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/140250
dc.description	University of Technology Sydney. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.	en_AU
dc.description.abstract	In 2000, the Indian government envisaged the large-scale transformation of Northeast India to power India’s neoliberal developmentalist project. According to the government’s plan, the region was officially set to receive over 150 large, public and private sector hydropower projects with most of them to be located in the border state of Arunachal Pradesh. Despite dam building being contentious the world over, the government assumed hydropower development in this region to be frictionless. Project documents claimed that the dams would bring much needed development to this “backward” border region by utilising the "abundant" water resources of the Eastern Himalayan region and produce “clean energy”. However, until today, not a single one of the proposed projects has been completed. The Indian government’s attempts at implementing hydroelectric projects in the Northeast region have floundered upon choppy waters. How did the central government seek to implement its seemingly foolproof developmentalist vision in this region and why did it fail? Looking back on the period from 2000, I focus on the government’s hype, the knowledge-making practices of the public and private sector dam builders and the failed environmental regulation procedures. By analyzing the contestations around the proposed hydropower dams in this region, I argue that the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) a technocratic tool and the cornerstone of India’s participatory environmental governance system, is neither successful as a consent manufacturing mechanism nor as a tool to manage expectations and conflicts. Instead, it acts as a legitimating device that helps make visible power relations, and thereby is generative of opposition and political participation. In this sense, EIAs succeed because they fail for their sponsors. My thesis uses the political ecology approach to theorize the role of Participatory Environmental Governance (PEG) in contentious development. Although legal procedures for this form of governance have been implemented in India for two decades, PEG is yet to be recognized as a credible space for negotiations between policy and politics and for producing meaningful developmental outcomes.	en_AU
dc.format	Thesis (PhD)
dc.language.iso	en_AU	en_AU
dc.relation	https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/140250/2/02whole.pdf
dc.rights	The author owns the copyright in this thesis including all reproduction and reuse rights for the work. The work may not be altered without the permission of the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from this thesis.
dc.rights	au.edu.uts.lib/ppc
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title	Making New Environmental Knowledges: EIAs and Public Hearings on Large Dams in Northeast India	en_AU
dc.type	Thesis	en_AU
utslib.copyright.status	open_access

Abstract:

In 2000, the Indian government envisaged the large-scale transformation of Northeast India to power India’s neoliberal developmentalist project. According to the government’s plan, the region was officially set to receive over 150 large, public and private sector hydropower projects with most of them to be located in the border state of Arunachal Pradesh. Despite dam building being contentious the world over, the government assumed hydropower development in this region to be frictionless. Project documents claimed that the dams would bring much needed development to this “backward” border region by utilising the "abundant" water resources of the Eastern Himalayan region and produce “clean energy”. However, until today, not a single one of the proposed projects has been completed. The Indian government’s attempts at implementing hydroelectric projects in the Northeast region have floundered upon choppy waters. How did the central government seek to implement its seemingly foolproof developmentalist vision in this region and why did it fail? Looking back on the period from 2000, I focus on the government’s hype, the knowledge-making practices of the public and private sector dam builders and the failed environmental regulation procedures. By analyzing the contestations around the proposed hydropower dams in this region, I argue that the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) a technocratic tool and the cornerstone of India’s participatory environmental governance system, is neither successful as a consent manufacturing mechanism nor as a tool to manage expectations and conflicts. Instead, it acts as a legitimating device that helps make visible power relations, and thereby is generative of opposition and political participation. In this sense, EIAs succeed because they fail for their sponsors. My thesis uses the political ecology approach to theorize the role of Participatory Environmental Governance (PEG) in contentious development. Although legal procedures for this form of governance have been implemented in India for two decades, PEG is yet to be recognized as a credible space for negotiations between policy and politics and for producing meaningful developmental outcomes.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/140250