Dissolution behaviour of SCMs in alkaline environment and mechanisms behind ASR mitigation
- Publisher:
- LABORATÓRIO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA CIVIL, I. P.
- Publication Type:
- Conference Proceeding
- Citation:
- Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete, 2021, 1, pp. 423-430
- Issue Date:
- 2021-01-01
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAAR_16th_Proceedings_2022_Vol1_pp423-430 Tapas.pdf | Published Version | 927.89 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Fly ash and slag are supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) commonly used to mitigate
alkali-silica reaction (ASR). However, future supply of these SCMs is at risk due to a global push to
reduce coal-fired energy production and increased steel recycling. Thus, an immediate need to identify
alternative SCMs is critical. In order to establish the efficacy of an SCM in its ability to mitigate ASR, an
understanding of the chemical processes involved in ASR mitigation is required. This study aims to
better understand the mechanisms behind ASR mitigation by comparing the amount of silicon (Si) and
aluminium (Al) released by SCMs under AMBT conditions, investigating the interaction of the dissolved
SCM species in the system (i.e. formation of reaction products) and how these correlate to explain the
differences in SCM dosage requirements for effective mitigation. Results show that the ability of SCMs
to release Si is as follows: SF>MK>FA>SL which correlates well with the dosage required to mitigate
ASR. This indicates that the efficacy of SCMs in mitigating ASR is primarily due to their ability to release
Si in solution. Formation of sodium aluminium silicate hydrate (N-A-S-H) in fly ash and metakaolin and
formation of calcium aluminium silicate hydrate (C-A-S-H) in slag post alkali immersion were also
observed. This indicates the ability of aluminium to bind silicon and precipate alkali in the
process (effectively reducing solution alkali concentration) and highlights its beneficial effect on ASR
mitigation. Further, in systems saturated with calcium, Ca is bound instead of Na suggesting the
occurence of competitive reactions and subsquent alkali recycling. Calcium, therefore, does not appear
to have a beneficial effect on ASR mitigation.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: